AP

Afghans collect fuel from a tanker shot up in an attack on a NATO supply convoy in Baghlan province, north of Kabul, Afghanistan, Tuesday, July 6, 2010.

Would you risk your life for a bucket of gasoline?

This brings to mind the tragedy of the exploding fuel tanker in the Congo over the weekend, which killed 242 people.

Discuss this post

Fill 'er up.

Hey, this is an amazing photo from AP. Whoever the phrog is who took it was mighty brave, as most cameras are not "Explosion Proof".

I don't think I'd risk it, gas is nasty and burns the eyes, not to mention it explodes.

    Reply#1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 2:59 PM EDT

    As far as I know, most people are not explosion proof, either. :)

      #1.1 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:36 PM EDT
      Reply

      Wow... real life "Mad Max".... who woulda thought?

        Reply#2 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 3:00 PM EDT

        In the movies, that tanker would have exploded when the bullets pierced the hull. So are the movies exaggerating? Or were they just lucky?

          Reply#3 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 3:26 PM EDT

          lola3: Mythbusters Episode 15 had a pretty good debunking of the "if you shoot a fuel tank it will explode" myth--it didn't explode. They later revisited the subject, shooting a tank with tracer rounds from a minigun--it did explode then. But the danger to these men of any spark or flame setting off the fuel still seems extremely high. I'm with SBPhrog... I'd take off in the other direction.

            Reply#4 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 7:21 PM EDT

            Thank you Stokes. The only episodes I've seen lately of Mythbusters were during Shark Week. Go figure.
            And I'm in full agreement. I'd be heading for the hills.

              #4.1 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 7:41 PM EDT

              I thought that it was the flames themselves that were flammable, so an empty fuel truck would be more explosion-prone than a full one... But I am not a chemistry major, so don't quote me on that...

                #4.2 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:37 PM EDT

                "I thought that it was the flames themselves that were flammable"

                FUMES.... I thought that it's the FUMES that were flammable.

                Noticing that flames are flammable would be a pretty redundant observation to make...

                  #4.3 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:52 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Lets Parrttyy!...This tanker could be full of ethanol!?

                    Reply#5 - Tue Jul 6, 2010 11:40 PM EDT

                    Yes, this is Ali Baba and the Seven Thieves in action! (I think I counted right-one guys barely visable to the right). Oops, then there's The Hand with Bucket. Oh well, it sounded cool.

                      Reply#6 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 1:24 AM EDT

                      I wonder if the people getting the gas are the same people who did the shooting.

                      There seem to be a lot of gas cans readily available for mere passerbys.

                      But then again, I don't know the area personally. Maybe it's completely normal for everyone to carry around a gas can or two, you know, just in case...

                        Reply#7 - Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:49 PM EDT
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.