
Michael Theusner / Applied Optics
A third-order and fourth-order rainbow can be seen at the center of this photograph, taken from the countryside in northern Germany. The tertiary and quaternary rainbows appear on the sunward side of the sky, rather than the opposite side of the sky, as is the case for primary and secondary rainbows. This is the first picture of a quaternary rainbow in nature, and the second picture ever of a tertiary rainbow.
Look out, Double Rainbow Guy: You just might have a double-double freakout over this first-ever picture documenting a quadruple rainbow, which is the subject of a scientific paper in the journal Applied Optics.
Seeing two rainbows in the sky is a visual treat, leading a YouTube user named Paul Vasquez to rhapsodize to the point of tears. But three or four rainbows at the same time? That's the stuff of legend. Triple-rainbow reports have been bubbling up since the days of Aristotle, but only five reports from scientifically knowledgeable observers have been recorded during the past 250 years.
Not until this year has a triple rainbow or a quadruple rainbow been photographed and published in the scientific literature.
Such rainbows are more technically referred to as tertiary or quaternary rainbows. Like the better-known primary or secondary rainbows that Vasquez gushed over, these rare rainbows appear when sunlight bounces around the inside of a raindrop, is refracted and spread through a range of visible-light wavelengths and shines out to the observer as a multicolored arc in the sky.
The light beams that creates single or double rainbows take one or two bounces inside the raindrop, as shown in this diagram, and they're always visible in the part of the sky opposite the sun. In contrast, third-order and fourth-order rainbows require a triple or quadruple bounce, and appear on the sunward side of the sky, at angles of 40 and 45 degrees with respect to the sun.
That makes it well nigh impossible to capture all four rainbows in the same picture — and because some light is lost with each bounce, the third and fourth rainbows are incredibly faint. Even if there are raindrops in the right place, the effect is easily overwhelmed by the sun's glare.
Last year, U.S. Naval Academy meteorologist Raymond Lee and a colleague, Philip Laven, laid out a prediction for the conditions that would produce third-order rainbows, and they challenged rainbow-chasers to go out and find one. Among the requirements: dark thunderclouds, and either a heavy downpour or a rainstorm with nearly uniform rain droplets. If the sun broke through the clouds under these conditions, it could project a dim tertiary rainbow against the dark clouds nearby, they said.

Michael Grossmann / Applied Optics
Michael Grossmann's photograph of the skies over Kampfelbach during an evening rain shower is at left, with two points marked A and B as a reference for image orientation. A processed version of the image is at right, revealing a faint tertiary rainbow between the white arrows.
Some experts thought it'd be impossible to make out the rainbow, but amateur rainbow-chasers rose to the challenge. On the evening of May 15, the required conditions came together for Michael Grossman, an observer in Kampfelbach in southwestern Germany. He turned toward the sun and started snapping pictures where the tertiary rainbow should have shown up.
"It is really exaggerated to say that I saw it, but there seemed to be something," he said in an Optical Society news release.
When the pictures were put through contrast expansion and unsharp masking, the faint arc of the tertiary rainbow came through.
Grossmann's feat made an impression on another German rainbow-chaser, Michael Theusner, and he had his camera at the ready on the evening of June 11 when a rainstorm came toward his home in Schiffdorf in northern Germany. Here's how he described the event to me in an email:
"Actually, the chasing started as a normal storm-chasing effort. I was on my way home when the storm front approached from the southwest. A nice shelf cloud had formed at the base of the storm, and I hurried home to fetch my camera (Canon 40D + Canon EF-S 17-55 mm lens) to take some photos. Then I went to a nearby field road, where you have an unobstructed view of the sky. However, when I finally reached that location, the shelf cloud had largely disappeared. So I was disappointed at first, but hoped for the rear of the storm to show some interesting cloud features. So I waited while heavy rain was falling.
"When the sun started to come out, I realized that the situation was just like the one Michael Grossmann had had when he took the first photo of the third-order rainbow. I had read about his observation on June 3 in a German Internet discussion forum for atmospheric phenomena — only about a week earlier. Thus, I tried to catch that rare rainbow, too.
"I had asked Michael Grossmann in the forum whether or not he had taken several images so as to stack them to increase the signal-to-noise ratio — a technique well known to amateur astronomers like me. Using that technique, it is possible to increase the visibility of faint signals in images. Unfortunately, he had not. I decided to use that technique to increase the chances to record the third-order rainbow. I took several image series until the rain stopped at my location. I did not see that rainbow visually.
"Back home I started processing, and already the first image series that I took when the sun brightly lit the raindrops showed the third-order rainbow! I was excited and started converting and stacking the order image series. One of them looked strange, however. Another rainbow was visible just to the third-order bow's right. Fainter, but still visible. I checked the Internet for higher order bows and quickly realized that that image series likely showed the fourth-order rainbow. I roughly calculated the radius of that bow and it matched the predicted location of the quaternary bow.
"I was stunned, as I discovered that this was very likely the very first image in the world to show this rainbow."
Theoretically, it's possible to have a quintuple or a sextuple rainbow, but the optical geometry of the bounces within the raindrop is such that the fifth- and sixth-order rainbows would be overwhelmed by the light from the first- and the second-order rainbows. "So it may never be possible to image those," Theusner said.
The research papers describing the observations, and providing guidance for future rainbow-chasers, appear in a special issue of Applied Optics. The bottom line is that the phenomenon is too dim to see with the naked eye, "with the possible exception of very rarely combined circumstances of favorable illumination, background and the strength of rain," Grossmann said. You'd have to point your camera in the right direction without actually seeing the bow, and then do some heavy-duty image processing. But Grossmann and Theusner have proven that it can be done. And for Lee, the meteorologist who issued the original challenge, that's like a ray of sunshine.
"It was as exciting as finding a new species," he said.
More about atmospheric phenomena:
- Strange optical illusions and light shows
- 'Tis the season for sky oddities
- Somewhere under the moonbow
- Two 'suns' spotted in China defy explanation
Here are the three papers published this week in the Applied Optics, the journal of the Optical Society:
- "Visibility of Natural Tertiary Rainbows" by Raymond L. Lee Jr. and Philip Laven
- "Photographic Evidence for the Third-Order Rainbow" by Michael Grossmann, Elmar Schmidt and Alexander Haussmann
- "Photographic Observation of a Natural Fourth-Order Rainbow" by Michael Theusner
Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page or following @b0yle on Twitter. You can also add me to your Google+ circle, and check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


This isn't rare like they try to make it sound. It's one of those things people have seen occassionally their whole lives but never thought anything of it. To 99.9% of people a rainbow is just a rainbow no matter where it is in the sky. I know I've seen these third and fourth order rainbows several times as storms are clearing up.
I barely see 2 complete rainbows... maybe they should have shown us the enhanced picture. I've seen much better, brighter double double rainbows before... this one doesn't qualify for me.
The two complete rainbows in the top picture are actually the third-order and fourth-order rainbows. I explain in the item that it's really impossible to get all four orders of rainbows in one picture because the brightest two are opposite the sun, and the third and fourth rainbows are on the same side of the sky as the sun. Theusner says there was a "weak primary rainbow" behind him when this picture was taken.
The article says 4 rainbows in one picture which is the point of all the fuss. I agree with Arwen8Aragorn1 if you say 4 in one picture that that should be what is in the picture.
This was a very disappointing read and photo. All I can currently say is, "Where's the Beef?" err, the Rainbows I mean......Sorry Alan, but this pic is not worth the time it took to take, nor was the article. I usually really enjoy your posts, but this? Not so much. When you get an actual pic of all 4 rainbows in the same actual pic, then re-write this article Alan.
Yes, I meant to emphasize that the tertiary and quaternary rainbows are different from other phenomena. Here's how Grossman et al. put it in their paper:
"In most natural rainbows one will only see the bright primary and the weaker secondary bow, and sometimes several supernumerary bows inside the primary. The latter are due to interference between the wave fronts causing the primary rainbow, but still are sometimes referred to erroneously ... as 'third,' 'fourth,' etc. rainbows.
"In recent years, the proliferation of unusual rainbow photographs by amateur observers has added unexpected features to these basic ones, e.g., twinned and kinked rainbows or reflection rainbows extending up into the sky. However, all the anomalies mentioned before are unrelated to the much more fundamental question within the community of rainbow enthusiasts of why tertiary (third-order) rainbows or even higher-order bows are usually not seen in nature."
Aren't tertiary rainbows often referred to as "sun dogs"?
I've seen these many times when the angle of the sun coming through the cloudy afternoon haze is just right. Often they appear to be just bright spots, quite wide off to the two sides of the sun, but sometimes they are discerible as a spread spectrum, especially when wearing polarized sunglasses. Of course, they are not perceived as an extended arc, so I'd never really thought of them as "rainbows", but I've always realized that they were due to a refraction effect.
It's nice to know what's going on inside the raindrops that really causes this.
Does this mean there were 4 pot's of gold?
It means the homosexual population is on the rise.
LOL thats funny!
unique event for that 'quad-poem'...ta ta daaaa
"Seeing two rainbows in the sky are a visual treat..."
It sure are.
I'll fixes that mistake
then it might be something about Germany because when i was in the US Army i was stationed there and also saw a triple rainbow which was very distict and that was back in 1971, but one or four rainbows is a beautiful thing to see especially if you're a Christian because of the promise that it stands for. it's been raining here in Gilroy, CA and i saw a single one and it was no less beautiful that the triple one i saw in Germany
Agreed fernando. :)
I saw, along with 100 other band members, a quadruple rainbow about 23 years ago at band camp. We were on the field about to start practicing our formations after a rain, and someone pointed it out to us (it was behind us). We turned around and saw the most beautiful set of rainbows. The primary rainbow was so incredibly bold it didn't even look transparent. It was as if it were completely solid. Each rainbow above the primary was slightly lighter than the one below it. The secondary was as bold as I've typically seen for a single rainbow. The fourth rainbow was pretty faint, but clearly visible.
Of course, in those days, no one just happened to carry a camera around with them to document the sight. But we certainly had the privilege to see it with our eyes...and I can still picture it to this day.
Ryan was there a flute involved?
That's very cool, but the phenomenon is a bit different. As noted above, you were probably seeing the "supernumerary" rainbows caused by interference. To see the tertiary rainbow, you would have to turn around and look toward the sun ... and you probably would not have seen it with the naked eye. It's also possible to see sun dogs, which are not the same thing. In any case, I don't think I've ever experienced the kind of sighting you enjoyed, so I'm definitely jealous.
How are sun dogs not the same thing? The sun light hits a diffuse cloud layer at just the right angle, gets bounced around, what, three times within each drop, and refracts to the viewer's eye from both peripheral postions. It's not a "bow" because the alignment is only good at a narrow position where the cloud layer exists insted of being an extended zone due to falling rain drops.
With sunglasses on, the multi-colored spectrum is often visible. I say sun dogs are tertiary rainbows, just really short ones.
I don't see 'em. I see two.
Right, the two that you're seeing are actually the third and fourth rainbows in a set. The first and second ones would be on the opposite end of the sky. And the photographer noted that at the time he took this picture, there was only a weak primary rainbow, and the secondary couldn't be seen with the naked eye. It's a very subtle and weird phenomenon.
Rainbows are a sign that you fat girls aren't putting out enough.
I'll give you a hint... It means it's raining!! Nice picture though.
Neat!
I personally have seen an amazingly bright parhelion while teaching snowboarding. (the best way i can describe it is an eye made out of rainbows with the sun as the pupil.)
Is this the same effect as having a parhelion during a rainbow, or is it something different?
oh, even more neat, they ARE different, thanks for the link to the diagram. I am definitely going to be on the lookout for 3rd order rainbows now :)
I was hiking around a reservation in AZ years back, and a brief summer storm came through. As it was clearing we saw a quad rainbow, a VERY faint quint according to two others. I was able to get the triple and a very very faint quad on the grainy disposable camera I had on me. I think i should go and look for box of photos if it's such a rarity.
That would be very cool if you ever found that picture... Feel free to send it to alan-at-thecaseforpluto-dot-com and I'll add it in if you like.
Does the faint "ring around the moon" effect count as a tertiary moonbow? Sometimes (rarely) there's two rings, that would be the quaternary moonbow as well.
I don't know if my personal experience is the same phenomena as is being discussed here. But we (3 adults and 2 young Children) witnessed a barrage of Rainbows late one early summer afternoon ( abt 1993). I stopped the vehicle and we took 35mm pictures with wide angle of them. They filled the eastern sky. At least 8 and possibly more, intense colors. I don't know precisely where the photos are now, but have seen them with in the last 10 years. Your thoughts?
My God. We cant even find common ground when it comes to rainbows.
Ask Kermit the frog.
The last time I chased a rainbow I came face to face with the Rainbow Devil boss in the Neo Arcadian Tower. I lost that battle. To this day I have nightmares of the Rainbow Devil's stretched punch attack or its transformation into a Dinosaur-like head. Or its very explosive attack where Rainbow Devil launches pieces of itself everywhere in a spiral form. Devastating! What I am trying to say is don't trust rainbows. If you are one of those people out there chasing these rainbows in search for the pot of gold like I was, you will only come face to face with the Rainbow Devil. Your only way of defense is a plasma beam cannon attached to your arm. Since I am the only person with a plasma cannon fused to my arm it is likely that you or your rainbow chasing friends won't stand a chance against a stretched punch to your face.
Perhaps you should be in the video game design business, if you're not already.
Regarding the rainbows if I am clear on this, to see a true quaternary rainbow 2 of them would be on one side and then turn around and see the other 2 behind you? This is why it is difficult to photograph? I know nothing of this beautiful science other than they are beautiful to witness. I have a photograph of a double and when I was at the Santa Barbara coastline after a light rain the double rainbows were so intense that several motorists stopped to get out and photograph. I have black and white and color photo's but I am not sure if they are important or not. I do know that the primary was so bright that when I was outside of my car it looked as if I could reach out and touch it and the second was even more bold that a normal rainbow.
I do not have the money or time to pursue the degree, but I am a genius if you have any questions. I own the theory that 2061 is "R.D." recently deceased; AKA Heaven as well as earth is only .5 of 13 orbiting
I have seen triple rainbows in Colorado on many occassions.