David McNew / Reuters

Occupy Los Angeles protesters work on the expansion of a structure they are building between four palm trees, dubbed "City Hall Stronghold", where they plan to stay and face arrest when police arrive to evict people from the Occupy Movement encampment at City Hall Park in Los Angeles, California, late on Nov. 28, 2011. The protesters have been camping on the lawns of City Hall since October 1, outlasting major encampments broken up by police in big cities across the nation.

Defying calls to leave, Occupy LA protesters build themselves a 'stronghold'

The Associated Press reports from LOS ANGELES:

Occupy Wall Street protesters who defied a deadline to remove their weeks-old encampment on the Los Angeles City Hall lawn stood their ground Tuesday as they faced uncertainty over when or if police would push them out of the park — and if an eviction could happen without the kind of violence that has engulfed the removal of protest sites in other cities.

Protesters in the nation's second largest city have turned to the federal courts to keep officers away after disobeying a city-imposed 12:01 a.m. deadline Monday to take down their camp. They argue that the City Council passed a resolution in support of the movement and that the city's mayor and police did not have the authority to evict them. Continue reading.

See more pictures of the Occupy movement on PhotoBlog.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

Where's a good Hurricane when you need one.

  • 16 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:37 AM EST

I view this as a sad commentary on our education system. We do a very poor job of teaching people basic life skills in high school, and this is one of the results...we have a generation (2?) that doesn't understand how to manage money or plan for their future. All they know is they are out of mom and dad's house and they can't figure out how to keep getting everything they want. It's really very sad.

  • 11 votes
#1.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:46 AM EST

Man I miss the old fashioned hunger strikes.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:59 AM EST

The LA OWSers are building them selves a HOOVERVILLE !!! Smart move on their part . It forceses more media attention on them . By doing this they also are forceing the fat cats of wall street and our corrupt congress to stand up and take notice . Their message is loud and clear. Clean up the corruption in washington and wall street .

It woun't be long and the police in full riot gear will be told go in and destroy it. But the ows will continue on pressing the government and wall street to clean up their act . Honest government will return !!!! NEXT STOP IS DC .

bob

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:33 AM EST

Bob before they force the gov and wall st. to clean up their act do you think OWS might first clean up their own mess before they spread the plague or something?

  • 8 votes
#1.4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:50 AM EST

This is one ugly group of weirdos. OWS L.A. attracts the main stream media because it is a tiny enclave of the most strange characters ever to be seen in one locality. One city, out of 172 cites of significant size in California.

  • 5 votes
#1.5 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:51 AM EST

Here is your Obamaville. What the hard-Left wants everyone to live in, a shanty town.

  • 6 votes
#1.6 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:54 AM EST

Well what do you expect? OWS isn't owned by corporations like the Tea Parties, so it's not exactly like they have the money to rent space in the Ritz- Carlton.

  • 3 votes
#1.7 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:17 AM EST

@ Willing.Sniper, really? We had 8 years of Reagan, 4 years of GHWB, & 8 years of GWB with all their Corporation/upper 0.1% of the population friendly ideas and it is Obamaville? Really? Is there extra sodium fluoride in your water?

Truth told it doesn't matter who is in office, a D or an R, the decisions made only benefit the few. If you don't believe that, there really is extra fluoride in your water.

  • 3 votes
#1.8 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:14 PM EST

Looks like a strong tree house. I don't think the santa ana winds or even the big bad wolf can take it down!

    #1.9 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:44 PM EST

    maybe guidance counselors across the country could use this as an example to what happens to you when you make poor decisions and drop out of high school and so forth, theres lots of jobs that can't be filled because people cant pass drug tests, back ground checks or don't have the proper education....... why is that wall streets fault, oh there are problems witht he system but these people aren't even trying to help themselves.

    • 1 vote
    #1.10 - Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:05 AM EST
    Reply

    Time to go home to mommy...

    • 10 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:42 AM EST

    So you kids want to play war?????? Let's play!!!!!!!

    • 7 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:44 AM EST

    War is coming. They are out there taunting Americans, the Police with their filth and crime. Good place for jail birds to congregate..

    So needy, wanting so much attention from anyone, including the Media. This is Dr. Phil's Generation of advice--

    All the scrounge people have gathered together across this country to complain. In the meantime, many are collecting Unemployment checks so they can "fly" to certain destinations of Protests to a part of a group--

    The President does not pay attention to any of the OWS---or make a statement--"It's time to stop"!

    Too many useless people in America.

    Are they getting their Message across to Wall Street--oh, that's right, Wall Street could care less.

    • 8 votes
    #3.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:41 AM EST

    Maui....

    The President offered his support for the protesters...before things turned looney.

    Now he's stuck...he can't say he actually supports this mess and conversely, he would not do anything that would cost him any of the protesters votes...the grand majority of which would be his votes.

    So...as with most things, the President will choose to remain silent...letting the little people around him sort things out.

    • 5 votes
    #3.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:03 AM EST

    So this is what we get for coddling the children. “Do it for the children” proclaimed the Democrats; this is what we got for all that coddling. Shameful.

    • 2 votes
    #3.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:23 AM EST

    Tony:

    The "Little People"?; President Obama is the President of the United States--he is supposed to support ALL people here-

    Saying nothing about how the Chain Gang of People collected by the OWS, are his future votes. He needs every one. This is the garbage he wants associated with his Presidency and person?

    The Voters need to be well-informed, thoughtful this next time around, knowing our future President has real experience in mainstream life, mingling with them; and understands the seriousness of a collapsing Economy. The 2nd Great Depression is here.

    No more Spending!!!---these "kids" are just out for a "birthday party"; actually it looks like they are setting up shop, and the last thing to do is put a Wal-Mart Sign on their business in front of the Treehouse

    One problem; they don't anything about running a business, nor most are not employed!

    That's the OWS for ya---Obama's empty votes.

    • 1 vote
    #3.4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:57 PM EST

    Maui...

    Mr. Obama could not care less where his votes come from...as long as he gets the majority of the total. He'd have the homeless dragged out of shelters and the illiterate funneled haplessly into the voting booth.

    As for the "little people"...that basically refers to anyone who is not Mr. Obama The President tends to back off and chirp from afar when the heavy lifting needs to get done. The 'super committee' preps to go public and Mr. Obama is in Australia...as far away as he could get. Then, once the dust settles, he's right in front of the TV news camera to lay fault at the feet of others. Even during his 'health care' development, he was basically nowhere to be found...until the forty-pound plan was done.

    It's a word called "leadership"....and I don't see very much of it from the man who is supposed to be in charge.

    • 2 votes
    #3.5 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:21 PM EST

    Tony:

    Agreed. Remember ACORN voters bussed in to vote. They believed all were going to get their mortgages, rent, food, and health care paid for. None have received any of the promises. Those people have no interest in this man anymore--

    We have another type of ACORN operation with the OWS---they will sadly be forgotten after 2012---Some are ACORN organizers--

    Votes, a signature on a ballot, if someone shows them how to fill one out. Most do not vote in Elections at all.

    Numbers. That does not create Leadership, as you have already pointed out many issues ignored, only to the time weeks and months later, O took some kind of stand on the subject; usually an apology.

    I want to see this President succeed, yes. It has been 3 years; most people are living in ditches, because there has been no progress. No one can blame all this trouble has been "Inherited" like a Trust Fund.

    • 1 vote
    #3.6 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:53 PM EST

    Maui2/Willing.Sniper:

    You two have no idea what you are talking about. I'm 44, I hold a job that puts me above the median income and my wife makes more than I do. I take a shower every day, and I don't expect anyone in the government to give me anything but proper governance. I support OWS financially, vocally, and by carrying a sign, physically. I have not been coddled and I resent that you imply as much.

    You two clearly haven't talked to anyone from OWS, nor have you visited any of the protests except perhaps to vent your pathetic screeds. Either that or you have, but you instead choose to lie.

    Take your lies elsewhere. Free speech does not include made up bologna presented as truth - that would be slander. Your hateful speech is neither protected nor appreciated.

    • 1 vote
    #3.7 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:18 PM EST

    TH...

    I believe they are offering "opinion"...which others are free to agree or disagree with. You cannot "slander" someone with a personal opinion.

    And are any who wish to express an opinion obligated to first visit an OWS protest site before putting that opinion into words ? I live in Connecticut...where the so-called protest near the state capital was made up mostly of SEIU union members. Am I supposed to have a discussion with them before forming anything I might put into written words ?

    You are right about one thing..."free speech does not include made up bologna presented as truth"...that should apply to the protesters, as well as anyone else.

      #3.8 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:27 PM EST

      All the scrounge people have gathered together across this country to complain. In the meantime, many are collecting Unemployment checks so they can "fly" to certain destinations of Protests to a part of a group--

      One problem; they don't anything about running a business, nor most are not employed!

      Most do not vote in Elections at all.

      None of these are presented as opinion.

      • 1 vote
      #3.9 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:52 PM EST

      The OWS are criminals, plain and simple criminals. The are openly defying numerous laws and being supported by elected Democrats in just about every city. Stop wasting precious tax dollars and remove this trash from the Public areas. Those areas are for everyone to use and not just for the OWS to destroy. They are a bunch of drug addled deadbeats and those that support them are just as bad. They believe that everyone else should fully support them and pay their bills. Any contributions to the OWS should be used to repair the damage they have done to the public areas, reimburse law enforcement for protecting them, repair the damage done to private property by the OWS members and maybe if anything remains that could be used to reimburse the jails and prisons to which the OWS should be incarcerated.

        #3.10 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:25 PM EST

        JoeB: You know this how? Have you been to an OWS protest?

        I'm not a criminal. I have not defied a single law in my participation. I'm not a deadbeat. I'm not a drug user outside of that prescribed by my doctor. I am happy to pay my own bills and do so. I don't expect others to pay for my needs, because I am capable of doing that myself.

        Maybe you should take your ignorance to a protest and find out the truth instead of spreading lies.

        • 1 vote
        #3.11 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:02 PM EST

        THammock

        JoeB is applying the actions of a minority of the Protesters who have broken the law against them all. That is....well that is what OWS does, OWS says all corporate people are bad because of a minority of corporate law breakers.

        • 2 votes
        #3.12 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:43 PM EST

        Tony:

        Thumbs up on the State of Connecticut---Go Huskies!

        • 1 vote
        #3.13 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:25 PM EST
        Reply

        "City Hall Stronghold"? Looks more like a tree house full of junk.

        • 13 votes
        Reply#4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:47 AM EST

        This has become nothing more than a joke. They are hurting whatever cause they once had.

        • 15 votes
        Reply#5 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:52 AM EST

        What a bunch of morons. Too bad we can't put them on a boat and ship them somewhere.

        • 13 votes
        Reply#6 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:54 AM EST

        I hope they are not "Street People" with Mental problems, such as most on the City's street who have untreated Schizophrenia.

        True fact.

        • 5 votes
        #6.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:56 AM EST
        Reply

        Head em up, move em out...

        • 3 votes
        Reply#7 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:58 AM EST

        This is what happens when you adopt the "warm and fuzzy" approach to dealing with the protesters like Villaraigosa has.

        • 7 votes
        Reply#8 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:58 AM EST

        In L.A. most laws are optional.They can't even keep Lindsay Lohan in jail more than one hour due to costs. The city is broke, broke, broke.

        • 2 votes
        #8.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:25 AM EST
        Reply

        Hippie construction at its finest.

        • 11 votes
        Reply#9 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:58 AM EST

        The Hippies of the 60′s will almost uniformly tell you that their “movement” was a failure. They thought they could live a communal life of love and friendship. What they found was basic human traits such as laziness, jealousy, envy, and filth.

        The hippies in a commune would not do their fair share of the work.

        Cleaning, cooking, gardening, etc. More and more people came to just take a handout and do nothing and they couldn’t survive. ( sound familiar?!)

        Now they are grown and tell about how their vision was wrong.

        • 11 votes
        #9.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:58 AM EST

        Willing Sniper I wish I could vote your comment up by more than one vote.

        • 4 votes
        #9.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:25 AM EST

        And to think...another article referred to this as being an, "elaborate tree house." I half expected Swiss Family Robinson...but instead saw that ghetto abode.

          #9.3 - Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:25 AM EST
          Reply

          I wonder if they got a building permit for that.

          • 6 votes
          Reply#10 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:01 AM EST

          No. They didn't get any permit. Don't have any permit.

            #10.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:00 AM EST

            The Bill of Rights is their permit, WS.

            • 1 vote
            #10.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:18 AM EST

            The Bill of Rightsis their permit, WS.

            The Supreme Court says your wrong. They do not have "superior rights".

            The Supreme Court has already ruled that city ordinances CAN be used to stop protests as long as those laws/ordinances are subject neutral. That means the same goes for everyone; all groups are subject to the same ordinances regardless of political leanings.

            • 6 votes
            #10.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:27 AM EST

            Willing.Sniper, you fan of all the SCOTUS decisions? Emminent domain perhaps? If you believe you're better off with 0.1% prospering... here's your Kool Aid with extra fluoride.

            • 1 vote
            #10.4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:18 PM EST

            I thought it was supposed to be "1%" that are "propering" while the other 99%...like that nimrod in the above photo...who are working their butts off to create a better place for all ???

              #10.5 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:37 PM EST

              Once again, WS, explain how equal rights is suddenly now "superior rights." Go on. Take your time if you have to.

                #10.6 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:22 PM EST

                Toasty...you're being quite ridiculous at this point. It's obvious you wouldn't be standing anywhere because you're too busy following WS around on the forums and commenting on anything you feel your opinion adds value to. Other people here are actually debating their opinions in an adult fashion, you on the other hand are just trolling. Seriously.

                • 2 votes
                #10.7 - Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:23 AM EST
                Reply

                Simply laughable.

                • 3 votes
                Reply#11 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:16 AM EST

                Since when was protesting considered Un-American? If you don't agree with the cause, that's fine. But don't rip on folks just because they are protesting something you consider unorthodox.

                • 6 votes
                Reply#12 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:23 AM EST

                There is nothing wrong with protesting Tohkrah, but you have to do it legally. Just because you put a " protesting tag " on the event does not mean you can break local laws.

                • 11 votes
                #12.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:26 AM EST

                When your actions negatively impact others (ex: taking over a public park, and effectively asking taxpayers to pay for your "sit in" costs of cleanup, extra law enforcement, etc.), then I have a problem with it. The OWS crowd could learn from the TP crowd. When they protested they did it legally and covered the costs of their protests.

                • 14 votes
                #12.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:42 AM EST

                Immitating the 1960's and early 70's?.

                What a lousy job of Organization. What is their next plan? and destination?

                • 3 votes
                #12.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:57 AM EST

                The OWS are infringing on the rights of others. They do not have "superior rights".

                The Supreme Court has said before when it comes to the 1st Amendment & free speech; if a protest is denying anyone else of their rights, it CAN be restricted, it CAN be stopped.

                The OWS tents and occupation deny the rights of others who may want to use the area in peace. It denies the right of others that don’t want to be intimidated in a public area. It denies the rights of others who need to pass by the area to do their daily business.

                • 7 votes
                #12.4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:02 AM EST

                So basically WS thinks that anyone who steps outside their own front door is denying him his own civil rights. I mean, because someone is standing on the two square feet of public ground in front of their home, that's denying him the right to stand there.

                • 1 vote
                #12.5 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:19 AM EST

                Don't think WS is alone. Speaking as a woman with a young child I would not go anywhere near one of their encampments. Drugs, disease and crime - sounds like skid row to me. That means I cannot use the parks, resturants and shops near them and it means the businesses in question do not get my money.

                • 6 votes
                #12.6 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:28 AM EST

                PJ...

                Right...and those businesses are being harmed and OWS cares not. And taxpayers are wasting millions of their dollars dealing with these messy protests...and OWS cares not.

                • 2 votes
                #12.7 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:39 PM EST
                Reply

                Arrest them all and throw max fines on their arses..

                This is long past a " peaceful protest " and they are asking for violence.

                When the police come to evict them, and they should be evicted, they are going to put up a fight.. Someone is going to get hurt, and all the OWS people and the media will then blame the police.

                I would put better odds on the above happening then the sun rising every morning.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#13 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:24 AM EST

                Jeremy:

                It could be another "Watts" in LA; during the 60's. Expect big trouble. People have already been murdered, and raped.

                • 3 votes
                #13.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:00 AM EST
                Reply

                Aw...isn't that sweet. They built a hippie tree house fort. I am sure the cops are scared to death and that the Wall Street bankers will turn over everyone else's money to them right away.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#14 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:24 AM EST
                Comment author avatarinappropriateprayerguyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                Dear Lord, please bless these young college students as they fight the deamons of wallstreet.

                And be with the above writers who are obvoulsly very threatned and terrified of the force that these young intelligent minds possess.

                They know not that they worship the false idols of industry and the media.

                And as they realize that they will never move out of thier doublewide, because the American dream no longer exists, reguardless of president, I ask that you send them their free million dollars that they have been praying for, so that they too can feel like the gods of industry that they worship.

                Amen

                • 4 votes
                Reply#15 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:25 AM EST

                inappropriateprayerguy, And as they realize that they will never move out of thier doublewide, because the American dream no longer exists

                You should be saying a prayer for the billions who wish they had a double wide, instead of hundreds to lazy to work for one.

                • 3 votes
                #15.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:32 AM EST

                Holy,

                Most of these OWS protesters are full time college students, how is that lazy?

                • 3 votes
                #15.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:37 AM EST

                If they are so intelligent, where is their list of solutions? All I'm hearing are complaints.

                If they are so intelligent, where are their candidates? We are still a democratic republic in this country, so whining on street corner is not going to effect change in Washington.

                If they are so intelligent, why have they resorted to violence? It seems to me that violence is the quickest way to quell a following of reasonable people.

                If they are so intelligent, why do they insist on alienating everyone who disagrees with them? It seems to me that they should embrace the dialogue.

                If they are so intelligent, why are they preventing the people they claim to be fighting for from going to work? It seems to me they are just as selfish in their pursuits as they people they are railing against.

                I could go on and on and on...

                • 10 votes
                #15.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:42 AM EST

                FreeThinker-657099

                Holy,

                Most of these OWS protesters are full time college students, how is that lazy?

                You should go back and take a look at the "MSNBC photo blog", if most of those folks are college students, then graduation age must be around 35 now. If they are college students, then get back to class and learn something.

                • 5 votes
                #15.4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:42 AM EST

                PH, Not that you will open your mind to an alternate viewpoint, but here goes.

                  #15.5 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:52 AM EST

                  If they are so intelligent, where is their list of solutions? All I'm hearing are complaints.

                  In order to solve problems you must first identify problems.

                  If they are so intelligent, where are their candidates? We are still a democratic republic in this country, so whining on street corner is not going to effect change in Washington.

                  Your beloved candidates are are a big part of the problem. have you ever heard the term "cutting off the hand that feeds you"

                  If they are so intelligent, why have they resorted to violence? It seems to me that violence is the quickest way to quell a following of reasonable people.

                  During protests, violence sometimes happens, remember the the 60's, it could be a hell of alot worse.

                  If they are so intelligent, why do they insist on alienating everyone who disagrees with them? It seems to me that they should embrace the dialogue.

                  Alienating? ive had many conversations with protesters. and not i dont agree with everything they say. I dont think this alienation claim is your own.

                  If they are so intelligent, why are they preventing the people they claim to be fighting for from going to work? It seems to me they are just as selfish in their pursuits as they people they are railing against.

                  With leadership that will change.

                  • 2 votes
                  #15.6 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:10 AM EST

                  In order to solve problems you must first identify problems.

                  It's been months now. I think everyone understands what the problems are. It's time to put or shut up.

                  Your beloved candidates are are a big part of the problem. have you ever heard the term "cutting off the hand that feeds you"

                  My beloved candidates? Who said I loved any of the candidates? Actually, I dislike them all. I am realistic though and, whether you like it or not, we have a political process in this country (as a democratic republic) that must be followed to implement change in D.C. Please explain to me how building a fort in L.A. is "cutting off the hand that feeds."

                  During protests, violence sometimes happens, remember the the 60's, it could be a hell of alot worse.

                  Perhaps. But if they were smart they would realize it does more harm than good and they would do something about it - or at least take some personal responsibility for it. That was my only point.

                  Alienating? ive had many conversations with protesters. and not i dont agree with everything they say. I dont think this alienation claim is your own.

                  Really? Is that why you assumed I wouldn't have an open mind before even posting anything? Is that why you called them my "beloved" candidates? You could have made your post without alienating assumptions.

                  With leadership that will change.

                  If and when a leader does emerge, I will re-assess the movement. Until then, I can only comment on what I see and hear today. Right now, it is a mess of a movement that has had very little impact on Wall Street or Washington and has caused a great deal of stress to hundreds of working men and women that OWS claims to be fighting for.

                  • 2 votes
                  #15.7 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:09 AM EST

                  You have made some good points. I apologize for my assumptions.

                  My point on "the hand that feeds you" is this:

                  Many politicians are being "fed" by wall street, the same people that the protesters oppose. So don't be surprised if no major political figures stand up to show their support.

                  I cant help but to ask a couple of questions.

                  Why would the media portray people who are exposing corruption as bums? We know our beloved politicians are getting fat green from wall street, is it possible that wall street influences the media as well?

                  Why has the president not said anything opposing the outbursts of violence?

                  Why has no influential political figure stepped up in favor of reforms on wall street? I guess this is the same as if i told the dude who signs my paycheck to eff off.

                  Why would any huge corporate entity fear the actions of a bunch of bums? Maybe their on to something?

                  Oh, and that fort kicks serious butt.

                    #15.8 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:53 AM EST

                    Many politicians are being "fed" by wall street, the same people that the protesters oppose.

                    I agree with this statement. I think reasonable solutions are term limits and campaign finance reform.

                    So don't be surprised if no major political figures stand up to show their support.

                    I also agree that none of the major political figures are going to stand up for term limits and campaign finance reform. That's why non-established political figures need to emerge from both OWS and the Tea Party (which, at its origin, was all for taking money out of politics).

                    Why would the media portray people who are exposing corruption as bums? We know our beloved politicians are getting fat green from wall street, is it possible that wall street influences the media as well?

                    The same reason why the media portrayed the Tea Party as a bunch of red-neck, gun toting, racist losers. The 24-7 news cycle and shifting advertising environment has turned the media into nothing more than sensationalized tabloid reporting with a bias slant for red or for blue. Is it Wall Street that impacts the press? I don't think you can just blame the banks. I think money and politics in general, on both sides, control the press. The media can't be trusted any more and that's sad.

                    Why has the president not said anything opposing the outbursts of violence?

                    Simple. His voter base is involved in OWS. I doubt he agrees with everything that's going on but, like most politicians, he only cares about the votes. Unfortunately, he has alienated a lot of independents this way.

                    Why has no influential political figure stepped up in favor of reforms on wall street? I guess this is the same as if i told the dude who signs my paycheck to eff off.

                    Great point. Why hasn't anyone stepped forward? Where is OWS' candidate?

                    Why would any huge corporate entity fear the actions of a bunch of bums? Maybe their on to something?

                    I don't think that any corporate entity fears OWS. Politicians might, but corporations have nothing to worry about until the laws are changed. Laws can't change until politicians change them. So, you see, the OWS movement should be focusing on the lawmakers, not the banks.

                    Of course, those who want to stand up to corporate greed should do so! We saw a real impact when customers punted B of A over their debit fees. If you don't want to go after the politicians, then this is how to effect change in a capitalist society. Camping out in a fort in LA is not going to accomplish anything.

                      #15.9 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:22 PM EST

                      wow

                        #15.10 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:40 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Why doesn't all the Hollywood elite adopt a OWS child? Move them into their basement? Hey, that dude standing atop his contraption looks like the Wizard of Oz Lion.

                        • 7 votes
                        Reply#16 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:27 AM EST

                        Time for these clowns to stop their charades and commence job hunting. If the OWS goofballs applied the same effort to job searching they would be much better off. The taxpayers and the victims of OWS crimes would be better off, too.

                        • 5 votes
                        Reply#17 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:39 AM EST

                        The jobs that the orange clockwork (Boehner) created? The jobs that 'our mission is to make Obama a one term president' (McConnel) created? Where are they? Shanghai? But isn't that China? DF? But that is not Mexico? I am still waiting for the job creation so at least we can send them to look for work. But to send them to look for work where?

                        • 3 votes
                        #17.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:37 AM EST

                        I have a job and so does my wife. Either job alone puts us above the median income. Together were in the 86th percentile nationally. Most of us don't camp out because we have work to do during the day and families to raise in between. Stop perpetuating the idea that OWS protesters are all jobless. It isn't correct, or even close to correct.

                        • 1 vote
                        #17.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:27 PM EST
                        Reply

                        So, if I live in LA can I build stuff on my property without getting a building permit now? LA is letting these clowns build non compliant structures on government property? So much for CA earthquake resistant standards. If they get a pass..I get a pass.

                        • 7 votes
                        Reply#18 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:46 AM EST

                        Cry me a river, this isn't your property.

                        • 1 vote
                        #18.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:21 AM EST

                        It is his property if he lives in L.A. and pays property tax.

                        • 2 votes
                        #18.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:47 AM EST

                        Then it's public property. They have as much right to be there as he does.

                        • 1 vote
                        #18.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:23 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Release the hounds.

                        Or skunks. Skunks would work, too.

                        • 8 votes
                        Reply#19 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:52 AM EST

                        As dirty as they look would they even notice a skunk?

                        • 2 votes
                        #19.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:38 AM EST

                        Release the Kracken.

                          #19.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:07 PM EST

                          Im thinking more along the lines of backing a honey wagon (sewage truck) up to their little encampment and letting them have it. But then again, they may not notice.

                            #19.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:30 PM EST
                            Reply

                            There is no money and jobs are scarce, an old friend who was a kid during the depression told me they are disgusted with these freeloaders, he said in his day nobody blamed others for their problems, they just dealt with them, did what they had to to survive and they made it, he is a wealthy guy now, came from nothing, me personally, Im tired of hearing these folks complainging that things arent fair, that they dont have a chance, that they are owed something, I dont have anything either but its my own fault, and Im trying to make enough to keep it together and maybe make a little extra along the way, biggest problem I see, nobody takes responsibility for themselves now, nobody is held accountable for their own shortfalls, its ridiculous, the government doesnt owe anyone anything and neither do I, if I have more than you, get off your arse and go make your way, I do it every day, and dont complain that anyone owes me a better anything, donkeys

                            • 5 votes
                            Reply#20 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:11 AM EST

                            Saw Richie Havens, Santana, Crosby, Alvin Lee, Peter Townsend at the LA OWS protest. tghey were all in diapers and wheelchairs.

                              Reply#21 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:11 AM EST

                              Jammed new rift about drugs. Viagra and Aricept.

                                #21.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:14 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Hope the "Great American Poop-in" continues. This has been quite a Christmas present for all the Cops. They have reaped all the overtime they want. And of course, the money comes out of the city budget's that also pays for teachers, firemen, mayors, hospitals, and help for the poor and needy. These lice ridden, lazy, druggy. OWS, deserve the help and attention way more than the whacked out teachers and professors that taught them this ideology. It will be good when the teachers and professors get laid off because the cops used up all the city's budgets to protect them, and then they won't even be able to get free food or medical attention because all those programs will be shut down. What an irony.

                                  Reply#22 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:16 AM EST

                                  The irony is that you say all those things about OWS, yet somehow managed to overlook the overtly violent actions of the Tea Parties for the last three years. Talk about selective memory...

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #22.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:22 AM EST

                                  What "overtly violent actions" of the Tea Party are you speaking of? I sure do not remember any .

                                  • 7 votes
                                  #22.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:39 AM EST

                                  toasty has no though process. Just another lib shooting his keyboard off.

                                  • 4 votes
                                  #22.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:50 AM EST

                                  Ever hear of Lauren Valle, PJ? How about Tom Perriello? Does James von Brunn ring any bells? Perhaps you forgot about Joseph Stack and Byron Williams? Surely you remember Jared Loughner. And Joyce "Bullets Over Ballots" Kaufman.

                                  By all means, let's talk about how peaceful the teabaggers are, and how they NEVER commitcrimes or violence. Surely these people wouldn't stoop so low as threatening young children...

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #22.4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:31 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  2nd set. Obamaville Blues.

                                    Reply#23 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:16 AM EST

                                    Obamavilles sprouting up everywhere. Next soup kitchens and bread lines. Barry makes Hoover and Carter look good.

                                    • 4 votes
                                    #23.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:36 AM EST
                                    Reply

                                    What a great opportunity for a town hall meeting or beer summit. Our president sure cheery pick’s his fights; this could give him the chance to let his community organizational skills shine!

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#24 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:03 AM EST

                                    The OWS are infringing on the rights of others. They do not have "superior rights".

                                    The Supreme Court has said before when it comes to the 1st Amendment & free speech; if a protest is denying anyone else of their rights, it CAN be restricted, it CAN be stopped.

                                    The OWS tents and occupation deny the rights of others who may want to use the area in peace. It denies the right of others that don’t want to be intimidated in a public area. It denies the rights of others who need to pass by the area to do their daily business.

                                    • 4 votes
                                    Reply#25 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:05 AM EST

                                    I recommend that folks email their city councils and mayors to ask if they think the OWS has "superior rights"? and ask WHY are not be held to the same standard any other groups is?

                                    (not complying with basic city ordnances, nor being required to purchase a permit)

                                    • 7 votes
                                    #25.1 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:07 AM EST

                                    ROFL, and pray tell, what rights are they infringing upon?

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #25.2 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:22 AM EST

                                    It's in his post, Toasty; try reading it a little more carefully:

                                    They deny the rights of people who want to use the public land they've taken over, and they deny people's right to free travel when they block streets and stores. Do you understand now?

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #25.3 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:30 PM EST

                                    So let me get this straight... If I leave my apartment and stand on the sidewalk, I'm violating your rights, because you no longer are able to stand on that two square foot plot of concrete that I'm now standing on? So everyone standing on public property is violating your rights? Everyone who is outside their own private property is infringing upon your civil rights?

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #25.4 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:32 PM EST

                                    Nice try, Toasty, but that's not what's happening here. OWSers are taking over an entire park, living in it 24/7, and building structures in it now. Without permits.

                                    And you forgot that whole blocking free movement thing. Got a fail argument for that one too?

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #25.5 - Tue Nov 29, 2011 6:46 PM EST

                                    You can go to the park if you want. Go ahead. You just have to accept that other people are present, because it's public property.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #25.6 - Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:38 PM EST
                                    Reply
                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.