Iraqi voices: For 'the Sheik,' U.S. pullout is cause for alarm

Editor's note: Photojournalist Kael Alford spent 10 months covering the invasion of Iraq and its immediate aftermath in 2003-2004. She returned this summer to see what has and hasn’t changed as the U.S. prepared to withdraw its troops. 

By Kael Alford

For many Sunnis in Iraq, including a man I’ll call “the Sheik” to protect his identity, the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq is no cause for celebration. Rather it is fueling apprehension about basic security and the minority sect’s economic future.

Kael Alford / Panos Pictures

The Sheik has breakfast while his eldest son and heir Zaindon, 9, sleeps on the couch in their temporary Baghdad apartment. One day Zaindon will take responsibility for mediating conflicts and providing community leadership back in Anbar province.

I met the Sheik in 2003 not long after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, when I broke curfew and slipped past the scary Iraqi security forces at the Palestine hotel and, with a driver assigned to me by the Foreign Ministry, ventured out for a glimpse at village life outside Baghdad. A writer I was working with had previously met the Sheik, who invited me to join them. Outside his village, near Ramadi in Anbar province, we encountered another ring of security – this time a checkpoint manned by Baath party regulars in their drab green uniforms. But here, even Saddam Hussein’s power had limits, outranked by an older code of tribal affiliations and family networks, and they let us through.

In my early visits to the village I got glimpses of an idyllic life that residents enjoyed, so far not marred by the invasion -- feasts of fresh foods, wading in the Euphrates River with the Sheik’s family – but that soon changed.

Kael Alford / Panos Pictures

A photo of Zaindon in the clothing worn traditionally by a Shiek or tribal elder is shown on a cell phone. One day Zaidun will be a community leader following in his father's footsteps.

Village elders had initially given U.S. troops safe passage through their area. That attitude changed within months as civilian deaths and raids on local homes by U.S. troops fueled resentment. By the end of 2003, neutrality had changed to open hostility, and roadside bombs and ambushes on the main road through Anbar earned it the name the “Highway of Death” because it was the scene of so many attacks against U.S. troops.

I visited the area repeatedly to report on the uprising and checked in regularly with the Sheik. While his neighbors and members of his tribe were debating – and in some cases battling -- the U.S. occupation, he was focused elsewhere. The Sheik is a practical man and had many mouths to feed, so he decided to work with the Americans, figuring his construction business could benefit from some of the projects they were planning – building schools and roads or repairing basic infrastructure.

The Sheik made trips to the “Green Zone” to seek reconstruction jobs, but didn’t have any success. He said the contracts were going to American companies, stoking further frustration in Anbar.  When I left Iraq at the end of 2004, the Sheik was still without work.

When I returned in June, I found the Sheik and his family in a rented Baghdad apartment, very comfortable by Iraqi standards but nothing like the vaulted ceilings and marble floors of the family home in Anbar, with its vast garden and palm trees.

Within a half hour of my arrival, the food started coming – roasted chicken, salads, bread -- only this time it arrived in plastic bags from a nearby restaurant rather than on platters from the kitchen, because the army of women in the family who used to prepare the meals were back in the village.

Kael Alford / Panos Pictures

Zaindon, 9, climbs through a window between the laundry room and his bedroom in the family's temporary Baghdad apartment while his younger sisters and a cousin watch. The children typically play indoors for safety reasons while their father has business in the busy capital. At home in Anbar, they had plenty of room to play safely outdoors.

The Sheik told me had finally landed some reconstruction contracts related to a water treatment plant outside of Ramadi, but he moved his family to Baghdad because most of his business was in the capital and it wasn’t safe for them in Anbar.

But he said he was concerned that his business contracts would be terminated after the American withdrawal, when the fractured and corrupt Iraqi government will take complete control of infrastructure projects and contract procurement.

“I was given a chance to apply for an American visa, but I can’t leave Iraq” he said. “Too many people depend on me here.”

Among them is the Sheik’s heir, 9-year-old Zaindon. It will be his responsibility to carry on the family name and traditions – not just a patriarchal euphemism in this culture. One day Zaindon will be a community leader responsible for helping to settle disputes in the village. The Sheik would like his son to learn English so he can study abroad.

“My dream is to open a university in Iraq,” he said, explaining that providing better educational opportunities for young engineers is critical so that the next generation of talented people can stay and help the country to rebuild.

But he was concerned with the deterioration of the security situation in his village and elsewhere in Anbar.

Kael Alford / Panos Pictures

The Shiek's wife cuts melon while her two oldest daughters Yehmameh, 7 left, and Tiba, 9, watch.

When what was initially a mostly home-grown Iraqi insurgency became dominated by groups affiliated with militant Islam, many of them made up of foreigners, local leaders in Anbar eventually took security into their own hands. With the backing of U.S. forces, they formed “Awakening” councils – essentially Sunni militias capable of taking on the al-Qaida-inspired groups that had grown powerful in Western Iraq.

The Sheik said most of the radicals arrested early on were released without prosecution, because there was rarely enough evidence for trials and people were too frightened to testify. That's led to a resurgence of the radicals and put pressure on the Awakening councils from two sides – from the radical groups and also from the central government, which is increasing arrests of Sunnis in the region under expanded de-Baathification purges.

“Al-Qaida is distributing fliers again,” said the Sheik, “and although there is no way for them to reorganize like before, they are still active, only using quieter techniques, like sticky bombs that target specific vehicles and silencers on their weapons.” 

Kael Alford / Panos Pictures

The Shiek walks the grounds surrounding his estate along the banks of the Euphrates River in Anbar Province, May 2003.

At the time of my visit, the situation was growing worse. We cancelled a trip to see the water treatment plant his company was working on when we got news that at least seven policemen had been killed in a drive-by shooting at a checkpoint west of Ramadi. Three were relatives from the Shiek’s village and he was occupied paying his respects to the families.

And that incident was hardly isolated. A cursory Internet search for attacks targeting Iraqi police in Anbar province leads to websites of radical Islamist groups like Ansar Al-Mujahadeen, which posts videos, photos and detailed descriptions of operations carried out against Iraqi security forces in English.

In light of the increasing insecurity and purges of Sunnis from government posts, Sunni dominated provinces are reconsidering their relationship to Iraq’s central government. The Awakening councils that reined in al-Qaida in western Iraq that were once on the American payroll are now paid by the central government, but members have been complaining of irregularities and bad treatment under the Shiite-dominated government. They have no official position in Iraq’s formal security structures and weak political representation, leaving them in limbo and even vulnerable to recruitment by Al-Qaida. Governing councils in the Sunni provinces of Salahuddin, where Saddam Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit is located, and Diyala have voted for increased autonomy from the central government, sparking demonstrations by Shiites in the latter province and feeding concerns that the tenuous Iraqi state could splinter along political and sectarian lines.

But perhaps the most unsettling development in Anbar province is the resurrection and persistence of local radical Islamist groups that now target Iraqi security forces and Iraqi civilians as readily as they did American forces while they were in the country. These groups were unheard of in Iraq before the war.

Like many Iraqis in western Iraq, the Sheik is convinced that Iran is supporting the radical Islamist groups in Anbar, citing the weapons they use and their choice of targets, including local Sunni shrines.

As the Sheik sees it, that may be a long-term impact of the U.S.-led war and subsequent withdrawal that Washington never anticipated.

“The Iraqi advisers misinformed the Americans when they first came” bringing Iraq closer to the interests of Iran and empowering Al-Qaida, he said. Now, “It’s only the politicians with loyalty to Iran who don’t want the Americans to stay.”

More from the series:

Introduction: As U.S. withdraws, the people speak
Corruption in high places costs widow everything
Patchwork electrical grid a symbol of country's disconnects
A new day for culture and consumer goods
For women, freedoms under fire
Suspicious minds in a squatters' camp

Colonel helped with the ‘Surge,’ then his past came calling

 

Discuss this post

Not to worry Iraq the USA still watching we still got no oil to pay for war--plus obama stated when illegally elected he would get USA out of Iraq--now he did cause he is up for election and thinks this will help him. WRONG! But you Iraq are safe--we are still there and a strike force just 30 minutes away. We want the oil!

    Reply#1 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:36 AM EST

    Do NOT let anyone from Iraq immigrate to the US because for political reasons. Castro was smart. He let all the people who didn't want to live under his regime go (or put them in prison) and thus eliminated his political opposition, allowing him to impose his will. Samething happened in Vietnam. If we let the opposition leave Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. and come here who will represent and promote a more democratic country?

    Change has to come from within, from the people. Let the people who want that change come here and who's left to do it?

    • 1 vote
    #1.1 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:30 AM EST

    Ummm, wasn't the withdrawal date set under Bush's reign?

    • 1 vote
    #1.2 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:33 PM EST
    Reply

    So we basically handed Iraq to Iran on a platter.

    We should have stayed out of that country in the first place.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:37 AM EST

    We had to pay are way out of Iraq...each village was given $100,000. US dollars so are troops were not shot at or any IE-D's were on the road to Kuwait....Were not coming back....And Iran is on it's way..Sorry and it ticks me off !

      #2.1 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:03 AM EST

      There IS a problem with that. The Iraqi's speak Arabic..... ALL OF THEM. The Iranians speak Farsi, a different language. Although Iraq is ~65% Shia and the rest is a mix of Sunni, Kurd, and Christian, etc.. there isn't as much "love" for Iran as you are suggesting. There is a mess there, that has existed LONG before we invaded! Yes, Iran will have some influence, but not as much as some think. Iraq is NOT a melting pot... or even a stew. They are a mix of incompatible rivals, ready to fight at the drop of a hat! With or without any US troops, there will be bloodshed. The USA removed the one controlling force: Saddam. Ooops! Our bad!

        #2.2 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:16 AM EST

        Shoulda, Woulda, Coulda.

        Too late to play Monday Morning Quarterback. We can only change the future and not the past.

          #2.3 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:15 PM EST

          Although Iraq is ~65% Shia and the rest is a mix of Sunni, Kurd, and Christian, etc.. there isn't as much "love" for Iran as you are suggesting.

          As people say, give them time.

            #2.4 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:06 PM EST
            Reply

            We had to pay are way out of Iraq...each village was given $100,000. US dollars so are troops were not shot at or any IE-D's were on the road to Kuwait....Were not coming back....And Iran is on it's way..Sorry and it ticks me off !

            And you're surprised at the end result??? Let them go back to fighting and killing each other. Fine with me.

              Reply#3 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:28 AM EST

              No I am not surprised....It's a fact..

                #3.1 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:16 AM EST
                Reply

                Here is a devastating story for me. This man is a builder like myself. His service (non-military) is his contribution. He stays in Iraq to work for those who depend on him.

                He worries his life will be cut short or marginalized because of religious thuggery, (an endemic middle eastern disease like rabies).

                It is a sad fact that the diseased mind tends to kill, marginalize, or silence the healthy mind. Such will be the case in the growing shiite power structure of Iraq. Progressives in Iraq are on the menu of these thugs.

                Iraq is the cradle of civilization, our culture and way of life, (writing, time keeping, mathematics, laws etc.), can trace it's origins in the fertile cresent. It makes me sad to see the current state, I wish I could do more to work with people like the Shiek and his lovely family. If they are lost in this conflict then the whole affair was a wasted failure.

                What is sad is that the Iraqi's themselves are the key ingredients in the change, but alas, not enough are forward thinking and fall into the same old patterns of sectarian division, Al Qaida style terrorism, money grubbing corruption. How long before we see a military dictator?

                Perhaps Americans were the best dictators. They supported human rights of free speech, free enterprise, contract building, and freedom of religious expression. The roadside bombs, and sniper attacks made the job of securing Iraq a difficult one. Almost 5000 dead Americans can testify to the hostility against the liberalizing of Iraq.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#4 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:28 AM EST

                We were once a modern day cradle of civilization. Look at us now, but alas, not enough forward thinking and the new patterns of sectarian division, Republicans, Tea Party, and Democrats, Religious Fundamentalists who want to run the country, money grubbing corruption. How long before we see a military dictator!

                We no longer support the freedoms that you list. Certainly not free enterprise or religious expression. Women's rights are going backward in time. But money and power have all the say.

                Iraq never needed us and we never got the oil that George Bush went there for!

                But a lot of lives, both American and moreso Iraqi were lost.

                You're right. We won't be changing that world.

                • 1 vote
                #4.1 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:04 AM EST
                Reply

                He can rest knowing that the US won't allow Iraq to OPENLY become Iran-West, but if I were Sunni, I'd leave Iraq NOW as the cleansing is going to start in earnest. GWB's dream, whatever it was, certainly wasn't this... or maybe it was... I doubt even he could tell you.

                  Reply#5 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:34 PM EST

                  We blamed Iraw for 911 and wanted payback, well we got it with 4500 american lives, beyond 911, probably 10x that amputated and the cost of war marches on...

                  If Iraq wants or needs help, let them hire us. Lower the oil price, give us some incentives to die. I'm sure hiring soldiers would be a solid business.

                  The USA needs to rebuild here, in the USA, before we go marching out again. We are in a war, with ourselves, so lets take the same action-lets spend one trillion on non-war activities and lets protect the hungry, poor, and provide incentives for those to get trained.

                  Food, training, jobs, not bombs...

                    Reply#6 - Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:11 PM EST
                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.