Founder of dog rescue group arrested after 128 dogs found in U-Haul truck

Kyle Kurlick / The Commercial Appeal via AP

Members of the Fayette Co. Animal Control, Animal Rescue and the West Tenn. Drug Task Force round up 128 dogs found in a U-Haul trailer that was pulled over on to investigate for drugs on I-40 East of Memphis, Tenn. on Jan. 17, 2012. Instead, the dogs and one cat were found, all of which were locked in cages with tie-fasteners and no ventilation.

Authorities in West Tennessee arrested two women when they discovered 128 live dogs, one dead dog and a live cat inside a U-Haul truck and a minivan during a traffic stop on Interstate 40, WSMV-TV reports.

The Commercial-Appeal in Memphis reports that the dogs were hungry, thirsty and living in squalor, without ventilation. The newspaper reported that the arrested women were associated with Hearts for Hounds, a dog rescue organization:

By Tuesday afternoon, the women -- Bonnie Sheehan, 55, and a passenger, Pamela A. King-McCracken, 59, both of the Long Beach, Calif., area -- each faced 128 counts of aggravated animal cruelty, a Class E felony, and were jailed on $100,000 bond each in Fayette County.

Officials at the scene said the women were driving from California to Virginia. A check of the website for Hearts for Hounds showed they were relocating from Long Beach to Virginia. Sheehan is shown as the organization's founder. Read the full story.

WMC-TV's Nick Kenny reports.

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

Did the troopers stop the film truck too? This has gotta be an episode of Hoarders........ Seriously.... The women were likely sincere in their minds about "rescuing" these animals.... but they were also likely a can (or two) short of a six-pack.... They need help, not jail time.

  • 13 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:33 AM EST

What film truck???

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:10 AM EST

It looks so much like an episode of "Hoarders" that Jersey Bob's assuming that there must have been a film truck following them along.

Seems like a case of two well-intentioned knuckleheads with no formal training in animal care and little common sense.

  • 4 votes
#1.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:06 PM EST

Nope, serious jail time. And never allowed near animals after they get out. Or put them in a U-Haul with no ventilation.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:03 PM EST
Reply

like so many ''rescuers'' their intentions were good. i hope these poor animals receive the medical attention they deserve and find new homes. sadly this situation is common among independent shelters who are soon overwhelmed and do more harm than good. all shelters and breeders should be licensed and inspected.

  • 7 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:35 AM EST

Sam's Club has a big package of dogs just like this one. Poor guys. Hope they were a breed from Sardinia.

  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:10 AM EST

Most shelters are inspected. But they are not a shelter but a rescue group, two different entities. They are not the problem either, but society as a whole is. What we need are strict rules on breeders, no matter if they sell 1 or 25 pets. The other problem is lack of a mandatory spay/neuter law for all pets. These are two issues that need to be address on a Federal level and not a state level. The reason being is if one state fails to enact better laws then their surplus is then carried over to others. Animal organizations have for decades tried to convince the public to alter their pets. Unfortunately the public still doesn't get it and ignorance is still a major factor and proof of that is in the euthanisia rates. Totally pathetic that these animals pay the ultimate price for that ignorance.

  • 14 votes
#2.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:49 AM EST

It's probably a case where the women just couldn't say no to one more dog. Can't say I blame for wanting to get out of California.

  • 4 votes
#2.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:51 AM EST

Norskejente, how exactly are these women not a part of the problem? While I totally and completely agree with you that breeders need to be regulated and we should all spay and neuter our pets, these women had absolutely no business running a "rescue" organization. They didn't give the dogs (and cat) the very basic essentials to life, you know, like AIR! Licensing rescue organizations (in addition to breeders) would help a little. Hoarders will be hoarders and their mindset will not change in the face or regulation. Very, very sad.

  • 4 votes
#2.4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:21 AM EST

The reason for regulations is to expedite legal charges. Yes, regulations are needed.

  • 2 votes
#2.5 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:58 AM EST

Daisy, They are not the problem!!! If there wasn't an over pet population problem then there would not be a NEED for rescue groups. While what they did is wrong, alot of people who do rescue get way in over their heads. They also are more prone to mistakes when they are overwhelmed. As for licensing all non-profits have to register with the state in order to get the tax break. But making them have to have inspections could help. But again that would only happen if states took some of the money they make from the pet industry and hire more inspectors to do the job. Even though some breeders are open to inspection most of them never ever see one. Another reason here for their dilemma is the economy, which I'm sure donations are down and people giving up their pets is on the rise. They were ill prepared for the future of these animals, just as the pet owners were. In the end you have to get to the root of the problem first, and that is a law across the country that ANYONE who breeds a pet must be regulated otherwise your animal must be altered. Even with such a law as this it would take about 5 yrs to get the population under some kind of control. But these woman were not breeding these dogs and their hearts were in the right place, it just got out of hand, big time.

  • 3 votes
#2.6 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:19 PM EST
Reply

W T F !!!!! so so sad....................

  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:45 AM EST

Oh that puppy looks pissed in the pic.

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:46 AM EST

LOL!! He sure does. :)

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:31 AM EST

I thought the same thing!

  • 3 votes
#4.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:22 AM EST
Reply

NO their intentions were NOT good! They got money and lots of it from CA and when they needed more to support themselves they figured move and dump the dead and then make like they are "rescuers", when in truth they are con artists.

How did the film crew get there so fast. Like all TV and News stations they are monitoring every single word that comes over the police wire. The police had to wait for the animal control to get there, giving the News plenty of time to get there. No different than when they get there for any other violation.

  • 4 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:46 AM EST

PLEASE HELP US STOP THE KILLING!

HEALTHY DOGS AND CATS ARE BEING DESTROYED EVERYDAY :(

BE PART OF THE SOLUTION!

ADOPTERS / FOSTERS DESPERATELY NEEDED!!!

Cats on Death Row:

Urgent Death Row Dogs:

www.urgentdeathrowdogs.org

Urgent PART2 on Facebook:

Email us at admin(AT)urgentdeathrowdogs.org

admin@urgentdeathrowdogs.org

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:48 AM EST

VioletteN, I grew up as the child of a veterinarian and am married to one. The issue of unwanted pets has been going on for at least 40 years in my personal experience, probably much longer. Tens of thousands of animals are euthanized here in the US every day. Scenes like this are all to common, nothing has changed.

The cause of this, day after day, year after year is a combination of two things: complete and total lack of regulation with pet ownership, and personal irresponsibility of pet owners. There are two communities that I've heard of in the entire country that have enacted regulation restricting ownership of pets to ones that have been spayed or neutered. The enforcement is paid for with personal pet licenses, fines from related enforcement, and fees collected special licenses sold to breeders.

Hit the problem at it's source: It's easier to fix a dog once than it is to find homes for eight more puppies every year. You can fix a dog or cat. You can't fix stupid.

  • 26 votes
#6.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:19 AM EST

Well said, Stand. When will people get the message about the need to spay and neuter? I'm glad to learn that there are some areas where pet ownership is restricted to responsible people. I wish that approach would spread!

  • 5 votes
#6.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:37 AM EST

People are killing people everyday too, we should work on stopping that too.

  • 4 votes
#6.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:38 AM EST
Comment author avatarStykbowhntrExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

If only the passion were so strong for the millions of unborn that are slaughtered in this country.

  • 1 vote
#6.4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:48 AM EST

let's not to mention all the born, living, unemployed, uninsured, homeless people, many who have children. It hurts so much to see how people are in such an uproar over disposed of animals, when our streets from small towns to metro areas are crowded with survivors of our own creation; living in doorways, abandoned buildings and cars, shelters, etc.. When will the crisis of poverty and homelessness draw the attention of the media more than just at the holidays, when the masses want to show how much they care about their fellow man. As a society we don't afford humans the same compassion as animals. Spay and neuter dogs, yet make abortion illegal, when there are millions of unwanted 'children' walking the streets at night? That makes no sense. When you live in a disposable society and we walk away from wives, husbands and children only to start again elsewhere, is it no wonder animal are the first to be left behind. PRIORITIES!

  • 4 votes
#6.5 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:08 AM EST

Stand and Deliver, You are absolutely right. Until we hit this problem at the source it will never go away. That source being irresponsible pet owners. As a former rescuers who has rescued over 1000 plus cats and dogs and wildlife in the last 20 yrs I have seen it all. The most disturbing part was listening to pet owners with their lame brain excuses why they don't alter their pets. Money was not always the issue either. And to those that did have a money issue when it came to altering, I always asked them if you can't afford to alter your pet what will you do when your pet really gets sick? Oh yea and then to hear them say vets charge too much always rattled my nerves as I'm sure you have also heard people say. They have no idea of the cost of what it took to become a vet and the huge amount of money it takes to run a vet hospital. I mean who do they expect to pay for those costs? People look at me like I'm nuts when I tell them a small practice is over a million dollars for start up costs. In any event we need really strict laws on ANYONE who breeds their pet and for those that don't mandatory spay/neuter should be followed. All pets should also be microchipped or tatooed. Another thing that bothers me is that the government makes billions of dollars from the pet industry via sales tax and income tax from jobs and they do nothing when it comes to fixing this major problem. Ignorance from politicans and pet owners needs to be addressed and until that happens millions of animal will die. I find that totally pathetic!

  • 5 votes
#6.6 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:27 AM EST

I beleive there is plenty of passion for what you are referring to...both for and against...

  • 2 votes
#6.7 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:44 AM EST

People are killing people everyday too, we should work on stopping that too.

I agree Blake, people should be neutered too.

  • 7 votes
#6.8 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:23 PM EST
Reply

SERIOUSLY??????? A DOG RESCUE ORGANIZATION ..yet you let these poor animals suffer and don't have any ventilation, water, food and take them on a cross country journey...I hope they get prison time and shut down this rescue group...Bunch of losers, now tax payers have to find homes for these poor animals and get them vet care because these POS losers didn't do what they should have done, and lack common sense and dignity. Go figure, they were moving to Virginia. Why be a part of a rescue group and treat animals this way, someone needs to lock these bitches in a cab for four -five days with no water, food and lock them in a small kennel and drive them across country. Hell what a waste of human flesh and O2, let's leave them to die too. Who needs them, now taxpayers have to feed and water these bitches in jail too.

  • 5 votes
Reply#7 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:49 AM EST

Lisa, Seriously taxpayers are paying for these dogs??? NOT likely unless they are taken to a county owned shelter. FYI, in NYS there is only 3 county owned shelters. Many states do not even have one. Most shelters in this country are privately funded meaning they are non profit and are run by the generosity of the donors. Yet the government makes billions of dollars from the pet industry and does nothing to fix any of the problems. Many rescuers have their hearts in the right place but not the money in their pockets to fund their passion. Want to get mad at someone, then get mad at the people who bred their pets and at puppy mill owners who are allowed to continue their inhumane practice of making money off the killing of animals. Cause that is exactly what they are doing everytime another dog is euthanised. Make that your passion to put ignorant puppy mils owners out of business. Do that and then situations like this will cease to exsist!

  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:34 PM EST
Reply

Sorry, don't agree with you at all. These dogs were hungry and thirsty. They were being driven in a UHaul that had no ventilation and was full of excrement. They were all at the mercy of these idiots, and being driven over 3000 miles in those conditions. There are NO excuses to the treatment these poor little dogs received.

I hope authorities can find loving homes with people that are TRUE ANIMAL LOVERS. Something these idiot women knew nothing about.

  • 6 votes
Reply#8 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:51 AM EST

You don't know the full story, so don't be so quick to call people idiots who may be trying to help these dogs and cat. Maybe they were taken from a pound where they were about to get gassed.

  • 7 votes
#8.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:02 AM EST

In a sense that is true, they could have meant well, Road Warrior, but being in these ladies care wasn't much better for these animals, after all, they practically all died due to malnourishment, lack of water, food, some were sick, one died...none had air... That was hardly a better experience. They didn't even check on these poor animals, obviously.

  • 5 votes
#8.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:38 AM EST

What's the point in rescuing them if you are going to lock them in a uhaul with no food, water or fresh air? That's just abuse and it would be kinder just to kill them than treat them like that.

  • 6 votes
#8.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:08 AM EST

It's no different than illegal aliens paying a coyote and being transported into this country in trucks. Brief suffering is sometimes better than death. If the dogs can talk, they would thank the ladies for saving them from "certain" death.

  • 2 votes
#8.4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:40 PM EST
Reply

128 dogs? Ooooweee, I bet it stunk in the truck. Memphis, they better keep an eye on those dogs. They still anything in Memphis. I had my car broken into three times in six months. I got shot at one night while walking my dogs.

  • 1 vote
Reply#9 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:52 AM EST

PLease PLEASE try to find homes for this poor animals, just because one is a little skinny please do not KILL him/her....Put out a plea for help, there are many rescue places here in wisconsin, that would help, there has to be more all around the United States, Those poor helpless animals, my heart goes out to them

  • 2 votes
Reply#10 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:55 AM EST

NO their intentions were NOT good! They got money and lots of it from CA and when they needed more to support themselves they figured move and dump the dead and then make like they are "rescuers", when in truth they are con artists.

Steven100, Do you have any reference to back up any of this (receipts, cashed checks, ledgers, annual budgets), or are you just trolling?

  • 4 votes
Reply#12 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:57 AM EST

128 counts of aggravated animal cruelty a bit too much, especially since their intentions were nothing but good. Like Bob says. They need psychiatric help not jail.

  • 5 votes
Reply#14 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:58 AM EST

The road to ---- is paved with good intentions. They do need jail, but they probably won't get it. They are non-violent offenders and the jails are too full.

As to psych help - well yeah - but you can't fix stupid and counselling doesn't always help with a lack of problem solving skills.

Sat through many county board meetings about the animal shelter and violations in animal care - some from rescue groups and the laws are not strict, mostly under enforced, and frequently judges will not ban them from owning pets in the future or will only order it for the length of the ordered probation.

The perpetrators "love" all their little friends, and don't comprehend their own illness.

  • 2 votes
#14.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:50 AM EST

Of course the 'I love animals' line could always be an excuse that any liar could come up with at the drop of a dime. It is just as likely that the pair were collecting the animals for a research lab.

  • 2 votes
#14.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:15 PM EST
Reply

@KyleOrtonsLeg

Just dogs? I'll take my dogs over the majority of humans any day!

Please don't EVER own a dog for the sake of the dog.

  • 13 votes
Reply#15 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 AM EST

The sorry thing, Alex, is there are far too many cretins like Orton populating the planet!

  • 7 votes
#15.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:11 AM EST
Reply

This is what happens when Good People try to do something "good" on a shoe string budget and end up doing bad. In the best of worlds, they could have got the money necessary to ship those dogs in a way that such a thing as this could never have happened!

Note: There's just not enough people in Congress who give a damn about animals to see that enough money is allotted to see they are humanely treated!

  • 5 votes
Reply#16 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:02 AM EST

Sorry, but I work with shelter animals several times a week, and there's no way that two people could properly and healthfully manage 130 animals while traveling 3,000 miles. Absolutely NO WAY. This was a fool's errand, and these poor animals suffered for it.

  • 5 votes
Reply#17 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:02 AM EST

Health, If the money had been there to do it right, I'm sure they would have done so. If they're guilty of anything, it's that they were foolishly naive enough to think they could pull it off. Sad.

  • 6 votes
#17.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:14 AM EST

The problem is, their foolish naivete gives rescue groups a bad name, killed 1 animal, and jeopardized the lives of 129 others. They couldn't have networked with other rescue groups to find a way to move these animals in smaller groups and safer accommodations? They couldn't have found a closer location for their rescue than 3,000 miles away? I'm well aware of the lack of funding out there, but the fact remains that there are many groups who find ways to make it work. These two women, however, are total crackpots, and shouldn't be charged with the care of any living creatures.

  • 2 votes
#17.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:43 AM EST

RBTatt, that type of foolish naivete is something we would expect from children.

  • 1 vote
#17.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:20 PM EST
Reply

.

  • 1 vote
Reply#18 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:14 AM EST

Stand and Deliver, Excellent idea! A nation wide "controlled program" of spaying and neutering would be a merciful solution to a problem that's been far too long going uncorrected!

  • 5 votes
Reply#19 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:20 AM EST

Prosecute to the MAX............................

  • 1 vote
Reply#20 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:22 AM EST

Sorry, I don't think these women had good intentions, selfish ones, that they would not water and feed these animals and they were all malnourished and they have a dead dog in the truck???? That is not what animal rescuers do nor are trained on how to transport or treat animals. I have good intentions and my animals are never neglected nor suffer, due to my actions. I chose to take care of my animals and adopt them and they are my priority, as they rely on me like a child would. That is a good intention. Even whack jobs can tend to animals properly and feed and water them. I have seen MENTALLY HANDICAPPED children take care of pets properly, no excuse.

  • 4 votes
Reply#21 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:25 AM EST

Isn't it possible that the media and some redneck police over-reacted??? How do we know that they didn't pull over every few hours and air the truck or give the animals food and water? Remember, we are only getting one side of the story here and news media just LOVES to play up stories and villanize people to sell stories. And as for the competence of the authorities in West Tennessee????? Din't they stop them for possible drug trafficking in the first place? Why? Because the rednecks saw the California plates!? Too many people are making judgments here based on the opinions of some backwoods West Tennessee authorities. Maybe the women said something that pissed off the redneck cops so they made a big case of it and exaggerated EVERYTHING. As for the dead dog, how old was it, could it have died of old age? 1 out of 130 sounds possible to me!

Question all news sources, especially those coming out of places like Tennessee!!!!

  • 5 votes
#21.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:26 AM EST

Right...i'm sure this is all a big mixup by the redneck media and police force in tennessee...they had nothing better to do than make up stories...i bet they even planted the feces in the truck and killed the 1 dog to make it look bad...definitely sounds like someone is exagerating around here...

  • 3 votes
#21.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:56 AM EST

I can just see the board state troopers chewing on their doughnuts and asking each other what they could find to do for the day . . . !

  • 2 votes
#21.3 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:34 PM EST

Well, they had nothing better to do than to shake down a uhaul for suspected drugs JUST BECAUSE it had California plates, so I wouldn't be the least bit surprised. BTW, looking at the cops in the pictures, I think they spend a lot of time chewing on their donuts in Tennessee.

  • 3 votes
#21.4 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:03 PM EST
Reply

I'd like to see would be dog owners face the same kind of scrutiny that people seeking to adopt a child face. There are far too many "dog owners" who see nothing wrong with treating a dog like a piece of furniture or a machine rather than a creature as dependent upon them as a 3 year old child--and just like that child--in need of love and care.

  • 4 votes
Reply#22 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:32 AM EST

Is that ever the truth. It has been deemed by the courts over the years, that it is unethical to prevent people from having children, no matter the circumstances.

But no reason exists to prevent anyone from owning any animal.

  • 1 vote
#22.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:27 PM EST
Reply

Makes me wonder if Bonnie and Pamela were emaciated ... or were they "well fed"?

  • 3 votes
Reply#23 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:32 AM EST

What a shame. I have to believe that they were acting in good faith, but not very smart.

We've fostered over 80 dogs in the last several years, having them in our home until they were adopted. The one thing I've learned is that some people are stupid and will get a dog from a shelter, without neutering them. Some to breed for a "one time" sale. That turns out several more dogs to more stupid owners who probably won't neuter theirs. Over a period of time this will propagate dozens of animals that have to be euthanized. People need to know that having a pet is a responsibility.

If you want a pet go to a rescue group. You can find almost any breed that will come with shots, neutered and guaranteed healthy. Cheaper too.

  • 5 votes
Reply#24 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:37 AM EST

There are people who have the best intentions which sometimes just can't say no. Can you imagine being in a rescue organization in a rural area and constantly being confronted with Death Row Dogs trying to save them all becomes an enormous guilt trip.

Just sayin.....

    #24.1 - Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:34 PM EDT
    Reply

    They should have contacted Ms. Betty White before they departed from CA to VA!

    • 1 vote
    Reply#25 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:52 AM EST

    Again, this is why I prefer the 4 legged friends versus the 2 legged sub human.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#26 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:56 AM EST

    Large birds are in far more trouble than cats and dogs. Does anybody give a damn???

    • 1 vote
    Reply#27 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:11 AM EST

    In reality, things are not great for many species now in the world. The focus upon dogs and cats is probably because so many Americans can choose to own one, and when they do, the people can be in complete control of the circumstances of their pet's lives. Also, shelters are killing millions of dogs and cats a year. Just only one shelter in Lancaster, which is actually a smaller Los Angeles county community, kills 800 per week.

    My heart goes out to the birds too. Often discarded, at least the parrots survive outside pretty well here. But many just do not know how to care for a bird pet, and just do not try to find out how, so that many die in captivity.

    • 2 votes
    #27.1 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:26 PM EST

    Large birds are in far more trouble than cats and dogs. Does anybody give a damn???

    I eat turkey at least twice a week. Deep fried it is like a slice of heaven.

    • 1 vote
    #27.2 - Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:45 PM EST
    Reply
    Jump to discussion page: 1 2
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.