
Photos by Lucy Nicholson / Reuters
Lilly Earp, 8, changes the diaper of her five-week-old sister Emily, Jan. 25, 2012, in their apartment at Hope Gardens Family Center, a homeless shelter for women and children, run by Union Rescue Mission on 77 acres of countryside on the outskirts of Los Angeles, Calif.
By Lucy Nicholson, Reuters photojournalist
Lilly Earp changes the diaper on her 5-week-old baby sister Emily with the confidence another child would have cradling a doll. She's only 8, but she already shows the street smarts of an older child as she helps her mother. It helps to be resourceful when you're homeless.
Her mother, Doreen Earp, 38, who is originally from Germany, and her three children ended up on the street after her relationship with Emily’s father fell apart. They stayed in a hotel for a month, then with people from their church and eventually ended up with no roof over their heads.

Children attend an after-school class at Hope Gardens Family Center. One in 45 children, totalling 1.6 million, is homeless, the highest number in United States' history, according to a 2011 study by the National Center on Family Homelessness.

A child's drawing is seen on the wall of the center.
Today, they're lucky to be among the 150 or so homeless women and children living at Hope Gardens on the outskirts of LA. It's a place where those at the end of the line are given a life line.
The shelter for families is an oasis compared to where most of LA's massive street population lives on a grim patch of downtown's Skid Row. While homeless services are concentrated downtown, it's no place for a child.

Doreen Earp, 38, of Germany looks at her five-week-old daughter Emily in their apartment at Hope Gardens Family Center.
The number of homeless children is at an all-time high in the United States. One in 45 children, totaling 1.6 million, is currently homeless, according to a 2011 study by the National Center on Family Homelessness. California is ranked the fifth highest state in the nation for its percentage of homeless children. An increasing number of children are dependent on poverty-stricken single moms.
The Earps are amongst 45 mothers, 96 children, and 24 elderly women being helped by Hope Gardens, a homeless shelter for women and children, run by Union Rescue Mission on 77 acres (0.31 square km) of countryside on the outskirts of Los Angeles.

Elizabeth Lepe, 26, (left to right) Nancy Jimenez, 35, and Sheriill Stubblefield, 31, laugh during a therapy session at Hope Gardens Family Center.
The mothers are given therapy, and classes in life skills, parenting, financial planning, and encouraged to apply for further education, so they can get more than minimum wage jobs. They can stay at the center for up to three years if they’re in college.
All the children attend after-school classes, and the teenagers are taught about domestic violence, job interviews, how to have healthy relationships, and how to communicate better.
Kids grow up fast when they lose the safety and comforts of home.
Earp's 10-year-old daughter Lindzy overhears a woman telling her mother that she is going to an NA (Narcotics Anonymous) meeting. Lindzy persists in quizzing her mother about what that means. After hearing her explain it as simply a class, the girl retorts: “I know what NA is. I just wanted to see what you would say.”
These moments of maturity are eclipsed by the normal trappings of childhood at the shelter – the games and toys that replace those the children lost with their homes.
Doreen nurses her newborn as her older daughters run and shriek in the playground with other children. Birds chirp in the surrounding pine trees. A stream gurgles into a koi pond.
“They’re able to be kids here,” she says.

Lindzy Earp (2nd right), 10, plays in the playground at Hope Gardens Family Center.
See more of Lucy Nicholson's picture story about Hope Gardens and an earlier set of photos of an after-school tuition program for homeless kids.


Don't tell the compassionate republicans,or they will have both moms and babies thrown out in the street for being lazy.
How about you tell your liberal friends to hold the fathers to these children responsible to the taxpayers for their childrens upkeep. In addition a course on birth control would be good also.
Geez people. Can't we all just agree that this place is a blessing for many people and not bring politics or other childish comments into the conversation. Definitely a lot of people with some deep issues to address.
Usually starts with the left...if you notice DP-CA.
Person-hood begins at conception. You want them to be baby killers?
Besides, we need them for school janitors!
Jay the Jerk chiming in with a political rant. Tell you what, Jay, a concept for you to absorb: COMMUNITY taking care of their own, instead of big brother.
I know, your mind is blown. It's not a tax and spend solution, it might take a while to grasp the concept.
We'll wait for you.
bad choices lead to bad consequenses. lets all be codependents.
Heaven forbid there be a comment that isn't political Jay! Ugn. There are just as many cold-hearted republicans as there are democrats.
I'm glad they are able to get out of the streets, and maybe some help to find work or someplace to reside on their own.
All the while, bank executives that seized their homes are enjoying being mega-billionaires.
As a former teacher, I saw all too many cases of fathers who left and the family fell into decline. They need to track down these parents and make them pay the support their children deserve. Regardless of the relationship that there may be between the parents, they still have an obligation to their children.
Peace.
In most of these cases, paternity is suspect. It's been estimated that paternity fraud is 1 in 11 children across the nation and 1 in 3 in lower socioeconomic groups are calling the wrong man daddy. I don't blame any man for leaving a women and *her* children when he was fooled and enslaved into raising children that are not really his own.
Vincent Denali
Spineless woman basher, we meet again.
and if a father makes only the minimum wage or just above, how do you espect them, to pay?
I heard that! If he can only pay $1 a week or $1 per month per child, than that's what he pays. There's no excuse for not providing for your children! Both he and the mother made this child/these children together and It was their choice to have them. I do agree with the other posts which talk about being responsible and not having a family unless you're somewhat financially stable. Women especially need to get a bit of self-esteem and stop seeing their lives as only being complete if they have a man in it. Women also need to put the same energy that many of them put into selecting a pair of shoes, into selecting a man! Having a child isn't going to make somebody love you or stay with you and both mom and dad are responsible for their care, regardless of whether or not dad is only making minimum wage. If he doesn't pay his share of support then all of us, the taxpayers, end up doing it. I can recall all too many situations where dad left one family found somebody else and made another family with the new lady! Talk about insanity.
Peace.
Why does she have a five week old baby? Can't she keep her legs closed? Birth control? Abortion? Come on. Really. These children are the victims of selfish parents.
Sounds like the father split after she was pregnant, possibly after she gave birth.
I tend to agree with Stacia--unless you're absolutely sure you have a stable relationship and can afford it, I feel little compassion for people who keep on having kids. And why doesn't this woman, Doreen, go back to her native country? I would think that chances of getting back on her feet and having access to good social services are greater there for someone in her position. Also, why aren't these dads forced to contribute?
Odds have it is that this woman from Germany was once probably involved with a so called "German Bride" company that set her up with a weird man from the United States who could not find a woman in his own backyard and looked abroad. 8 of 10 times they never work out and many times these women are left in a country they know nothing about with no way to get back to where they came from, so they are forced to seek out help through a church which then connects them with a charity such as this. She is very fortunate to be in such a place.
SusieOh you still don't get it do you.
DP-CA wrote "Odds have it is that this woman from Germany was once probably involved with a so called "German Bride" company that set her up with a weird man from the United States who could not find a woman in his own backyard "
More American men are looking to other countries for women from cultures that support long-term marriage. The odds are also greater of finding a woman that doesn't look like she is perennially pregnant.
With 50% of US marriages ending in divorce and 70% of women filing, what man would be interested in American women for marriage?
Gingrich believes in putting children to work after birth it sounds like there are some here he could put to work.
Oh yeah Wheels? I hear Obama has a fine part time career in the food service industry lined up for today's youth, at the soup kitchens he's looking to open if he gets a second term.
Try to keep politics out of a good story about community service and people helping people.
Missy-- I agree that the fathers get off Scot free (and I can tell you it is so often the fathers that it overwhelms the number of mothers who walk). This is so common, and it is no different than when I grew up in a fatherless home 40 years ago. When will we make these guys pay? Everyone else ends up paying instead. It is sickening this still goes on. That said, I hope this service gives out free birth control, but because it is a religious organization I doubt they do. If you don't give these women birth control, you're just spittin' into the wind.
It's not always the fathers who "walk." My ex found out she was pregnant, and kicked me out of her life. A year later, the courts came after me for a child I didn't know I had.
Each case, Raincheck, bears individual scrutiny, because many women are gaming the system. The women who are, in turn, need to be scrutinized, as well, to make sure that they're NOT gaming the system. (Though, most states are pro-women's rights and men simply get the right to stfu and pay through the nose.. Ask me how I know, I dare ya.)
raincheck wrote "I grew up in a fatherless home 40 years ago. When will we make these guys pay?."
Many children are told their fathers left when :
1) there was no secure relationship - the man was never really there
2) mothers concealed pregnancy and birth
3) mothers are unable to name the biological father
Instead, the attention should be turned to irresponsible mothers for whom nothing will stop them from having a baby.
Gee, Vincent, I didn't realize i just fell of the turnip truck..oh wait..I didn't.
1) Wrong. Not only in my case but as in many others, my parents were married for about 10 years, there are long term relationships in most cases.
2) Wrong and by the way, WTF? a woman would conceal a pregnancy and birth (good luck with that) in order to...get support for the kid that's "not there"?!
3) This is true in some cases, no where near a majority. Makes me wonder where you're going here, but..
Ah ha! there it is! It is not the men's fault for walking out on responsibility, it is those damn loose woman baby making machines ( which, surprisingly must function with only one party involved).
Ah Vincent, this is interesting of you, any experience walking out yourself?
raincheck - Why can't the sperm donor provide support for his family? Is it really fair for me to support my family and another family because the father walked out?
raincheck, They don't need birth control they need to have their tubes tied.
Something. Birth control, tubes tied.
Joyce, the father/sperm donor should TOTALLY have to support these families. This is why I can't understand why we are no further along with this BS than when I grew up.
Stacia, I hate to say this but I agree with you and with Missy. This German woman, I just wonder, was she in her own country when she met this guy, is he the father of her 2 other children? Were they married? So many holes left by the author of this article. There's nothing to compare to having a tubile while still in delivery is there.
I've done volunteer work in women's shelter's and these are some of the ugly question's that are never dealt with. Women have to teach other women how to take control over their own lives AND their bodies. They usually have to be taught that they don't need to be with a man in order to feel complete as a women/mother. They don't have to have babies that they can't afford BY THEMSELVES (just in case they wind up alone) having a man is no guarantee that they will be able to provide for their children.
This "German woman" is the mother of at least one American citizen, and I assume that her other kids are citizens, too....and the story notes only that she is originally from Germany. I expect that she has a green card or she may even have obtained citizenship, neither of which gets rescinded because of poverty.
Let Germany and Mexico take care of their own citizens. The United States can no longer feed the world and cure all the world's problems.
the way i see it is that this whole mess starts with going to church where you learn right from wrong and you know when to say no and whatever you do it has consequences and well, it's just better to know before you know, you know what i'm saying but whatever the cause it just seems to me that it's out there for the taking and some people do just that and before you know it everything is gone and that's my take on things.
What does church have to do with it? You don't need to go to church to know right from wrong. My kids didn't and they darn well know right from wrong. They are also generous and caring people who could be an example for many church-goers I have known throughout the years. All you have to do is look at those so-called religious right politicians who would abandon the sick, old and poor and those who through circumstances often beyond their control need a leg up. I'm sure they all sit in the front pew on Sundays. Somehow, I don't see that all this religious fervor has done this country much good.
Oh Susi-Oh you missed the whole point which is typical. I will try to explain it as if you're a five year old. People don't necessarily know the difference I am glad your kids did and sis boom bah and rooty toot toot to them but people have to start somewhere and they may as well start where it's common for someone to un derstand what they are going through so that if they come in contact with it they are aware that it takes more than just a hi how areyou situation that they can't get out of.
OH Judd - Sounds like you can't take Susi's point because you're too sheepish to listen to anything other than the church. Point being - it does not matter where the message of right vs wrong comes from. It could be church, parents, neighbors, schools - dare I say 'community'. What matters is that the message is taught and heard.
No child should grow up under these circumstances.
I just don't understand why so many women allow themselves to become pregnant (or do it on purpose) when they aren't in a stable situation themselves. I asked one single mom why she wasn't receiving any support from her child's father and she told me that she didn't know his social security number or his legal name! Yet, she allowed him to impregnate her! This wasn't rape, it was consentual.
I have to agree with you. I am sick of the taxpayers having to foot the bill for irresponsible parents. And so many of this type have more than one kid! Okay, if you are young and really stupid, but to not learn from your first mistake....
They don't learn from their first mistake because there is no penalty for making the same mistake over and over. 72% of minority children are being raised in a single parent home. Welfare Queens, Aunts, Sisters , Cousins and Mothers all look out for each other and know how to play the system for all it is worth.
Approximately 46 million people rely on food stamps. Outrageous, and where do you think the money comes from? It is seized in the form of taxes from middle class citizens. I have a hard enough time supporting my family and I can no longer work hard to support your family and all the illegal criminal aliens.
I just new this article was going to be full of judgment and negativity. I think this is a wonderful program and I'm happy that they seem to put a lot of thought about helping these kids and moms have a successful life - time and help with school as well as relationship counciling seems like it will make a big difference in theses people's lives.
The basic problem is that all people want sex (what the hey: thats how they got here!). The reality is that alot of people do not look ahead to the consequences...
Let's not forget that no birth control is 100% effective (and don't give me that abstinence-only crap. That doesn't even work for the evangelicals.)
Quinn - If you think abstinence doesn't work then don't you dare come to me to support the babies that you supplied the sperm for. One way or the other the only way to have sex is in a responsible manner. If you don't then the consequences are yours, not mine.
Joyce, I can't supply sperm for anyone...I am not a man.
Abstinence is not BC - it's a behavioral avoidance of a healthy and common human behavior. Also, it's pretty anti-marriage to expect me to not have sex with my husband.
This is a beautiful thing for these women and kids. This is the kind of help we should be providing to the poorest Americans. For those of you making remarks about fathers getting off scot free, I certainly didn't. I begged to be an involved father in my divorce, but the ex wanted money and poisoned my relationship with my children so she could get the maximum, of which I paid every penny. The court didn't care and didn't try to intervene or resolve anything. It's called Parental Alienation Syndrome, and it's real. My kids are now 25 and 22 and I have no communication or relationship with them, because they choose so based on their mother and her family's brainwashing. Google PAS. It's real.
Buffale51 and I'm the other side of the coin. My husband left and has managed to remain pretty well hidden for the past 12 years (To be honest, I stopped looking about 10 years ago. I simply couldn't afford the investigator and the lawyer.)
You should try to reach out to your kids. I warn all mothers and fathers that children eventually grow up. When you see them, don't talk badly about their mother. That will just put them on the defensive. Build the relationship first and eventually they will see that you are not the person their mother claimed. Slowly they'll come to doubt her and if they ask, try to be unemotional, but explain things from your side. Your ex sounds controlling. I would bet that the kids are just scared to trust too much because they are afraid of her anger. So, keep the relationship on the QT until they are ready.
Women steal the kids, the house and raid the bank account.
Buffale51
Yes. PAS is real. While it is true that each case of divorce or custody of children is unique, you are correct about PAS. Much attention has been in the direction of blame and fear of abuse, where it is real you have a whole different kettle of fish and there are many cases where child protective services is absolutely necessary as in drug use or domestic violence, but we are talking about a parent not approved of by an extended family of one of the parents who is actually ostracized and even lied about, perhaps even threatened.
It happens too often. It is a terrible tragedy when one side of a family pits a parent against another or disowns both and possesses the children, or wherever there is a condemnation and total disrespect of a non-custodial parent who is absent. There are exaggerations and one sided stories ongoing for years, unknown to the absent parent so if and when there should be a reunion in adulthood, there can be some intense misunderstandings and a need to reality check some past history suddenly. It can freak people right out when they find themselves being treated badly or dissed by their own child for an untrue reason, never having had the ability to defend themselves and never even knowing. So why are some parents, both men and women out of touch? Mostly due to the pressure from the other adults in the situation and money. Many years can go by and people remarry also, they move far away and life goes on. Time is the big taker, if too much goes by it is not always easy or possible to recover a close relationship with one's child, especially with a lack of communication, understanding, or encouragement by allied, forgiving or supportive relatives. Much therapy and fair mediation is needed; and what poor mother or father can afford that?
For the child? This loss can be truly tragic if a child ends up wondering what his or her mother or father or both were like over all those years and separation, when they were alive never able to get together, and then, it is too late and the son or daughter never has a chance to know their own parent first person. Although it is veiled in judgement, or family prejudices, it seems justified, or not that serious...but subjectively to that person who is the child...it is as if that child were orphaned or their parents were killed in their childhood if left wondering for a lifetime with all kinds of emotions and attitudes about what they have heard from others, impressions that may be false, no way of knowing...being haunted by it, and that natural love left completely unrequited.
A single mother is so vulnerable trying to do the work that two or more people need to be doing while being judged so harshly. She is covering all the bases perhaps young and not very confident or skilled. She has the responsibility of managing and paying for everything and working while raising the kids. If she is not working she may be in some kind of training or left with the burden of overwhelming problems and poverty. Is it any wonder she breaks down with no money or help, and she is exhausted and stretched thin with no life of her own, no joy, no fun, no freedom to be the lady she is, getting no breaks, and getting no affection or support from a good husband, and when she dares to go out and have fun, she is the victim of the finger pointing gossips. Her family may begrudgingly support her but there can be cruelty and resentment about the kid who had to come back home for help, then if she leaves to go off to make money...the grandparents get left with caring for the kids. There is not enough space, other family members are inconvenienced, etc.. Ironically, it is the same extended family members or a new spouse that may discourage visitation and create jealousy, rivalry and animosity against an ex coming around.
The single parent has it tough and can fall through the floor of basic security and welfare. Women will, married or not, always need shelter and to feed and clothe their children, women who are married have it tough too, lets face it, those years are work and sometimes the lack of patience, maturity and understanding can cause rebellion, bad habits, neglect, estrangement, arguments and decisions made in the heat of emotion or on a whim, without that young couple knowing the depth of future consequences or permanent changes that will come after.
We must be more considerate about ALL parents and help each other to make this a safer and more decent world for our children, it takes a village. Many who are older have already been through this, there are ways that retired people can volunteer to help single parents through organizations like Americorps and churches in their communities. Just a couple hours of tutoring or babysitting so Mom can get out to do a class or errands is an enormous help, or just being a good neighbor in an emergency. We can all help in some little way that adds up if enough of us just do care and share some awareness, say hello, know our neighbors. In every neighborhood, there are elderly, handicapped, children and pets who are vulnerable and a watchful eye can make a critical difference when a sudden need or a dangerous situation arises.
Who better than a WAC? I was also reading about the women vets who are homeless, I have to say I felt angry. We have this homelessness while houses are standing boarded up? What??? For goodness sake, just give some of these wonderful mothers and homemakers a right to homestead a house! They are all over the place. What, you would rather throw ten thou per house to the city to bulldoze the thing down and waste it??? Well, there are tear downs, and there are refurbishable homes but they will not be - if left standing for too long and they are in every town in every state.
No more excuses. These women who are vets are competent and strong, determined and smart and they can put a little sweat equity into fixing up a home nicely... All vets, males and females, could fix many homes for their friends and sisters who are mothers and the sisters and mothers could be helping them, and this problem of homelessness would be solved in no time if those who have served are just given the chance to go to work doing it here now if we all pitch in and contribute to materials needed. Families, and especially mothers always end up doing most of this work anyway so give it back, even it up with these empty rotting but still redeemable fixer-upper homes now!
As a woman all I ever wanted was a home of my own but I did not get one until older. Perhaps this is the root of the problem, the need for these mothers is now not when retired. For these mothers, we need more shelters like this one for those transition times and we need more youth hostles/shelters in our towns and cities too for the safety and protection of homeless children and wayward youth. Refurbishable homes, if fixed and settled in by good mothers and women who need a place of their own... and by Vets with families who need a home, a solid foundation is established, taxes and revenues come in for the local city fathers, trades, jobs and businesses come in, and the economy gets better because of constructive, not destructive change. It's just common sense. As has always been since the pioneers, We Americans must roll up our sleeves out of necessity for our continued survival and shelter, and make what works, work. For these mothers, we need more shelters like this one for those transition times and we need more youth hostels/shelters in our towns and cities too for the safety and protection of homeless children and wayward youth.
I don't want to sound cruel but the solution to all these problems is simply to stay unmarried and chaste. There is nothing wrong with being a spinster and a lifetime bachelor.
You don't have to stay chaste. Just use birth control (condoms are cheap). And abortion is legal in most places. Don't have a baby if you cannot afford to raise him/her! It ain't rocket science. i
birth control isn't foolproof. Saying no is.
Do you always say no, Judd, when you are with a woman? Why does the woman always bear the burden of saying "no"?
Because the woman bears the burden of birthing and raising children, with the Dad is she is smart about who she lets into her bed, on her own if she's not careful.
It is really simple. The woman bears the first responsibility of saying no because she is the one that will ultimately bear the child. Sure guys should act responsibly but the burden is still on the female to keep her legs closed.
How dare you suggest abstinence to liberals? It give them a splitting headache.
Miss Sashay...
If this is the case then best to stay chaste and pull the old Lysistrata because no marriage is 100% divorce or cheat proof no matter how nicely daddy or mommy behave when at home, tubes tied or not.
We could use a generation or two that is sterile though. Should we have a quota? It would depend on the percentage of population....ie. how many blacks, yellows, reds, browns, greens, blues, whites or purples in the world. The bigger the amount of population poppers, the bigger the amount that must be sterilized in that particular color group. Would you be happy with that? Fair enough. Then we could sterilize all the multiple birthers, especially the octopussies, even if they were artificially inseminated. After all, as you say, its all such a burden, bearing and raising children...um...really?
Have you had any children? Were they a burden to you? A load? If so, or if you have had no children, I think you are ready for self extinction at the end of your life which is okay too. Obviously, some people are not parent material, and just cannot take it, nor are they good material for being continued down that old family line with all those cute characteristics peeking out of a grandchild's face. We will just put you in your pretty place with mirrors and you can talk with yourself all you want about how perfect you look and are. I once saw a parakeet who loved to say mememee over and over again. It was so cute but it got old after awhile.
Okay, then, all men should have vasectomies. Case closed.
Quinn, each case is unique.
It is a fact that many caring and well informed people have actually taken proactive measures of responsibility to curb overpopulation, disease, and other personal damage both emotionally and physically during their sexually reproductive years.
Firstly, by being honest with themselves and others about sexual orientation, expectations and safe practices. Secondly, by taking actual measures like making long term decisions about physical changes and long term life plans. Both men and women can see the long term and align this to their preferences and what is realistic.
A woman can have two children in a marriage and decide to get a tubal ligation if she knows she is older or does not wish to have more children. A single mother can make that decision knowing she cannot support any more children but knows she still wants to date or marry or have a companionship with a man in the future. A man can make the decision to have a vasectomy whether gay or straight, whether single or married after having a couple children as a part of a couple who have made that choice together. This is all a part of the many options of long term family planning.
We all have seen that even in the best marriages, with the most ambitious and hopeful couples, over time things can go sour in unexpected ways after children are born. Whatever the details in all the different cases, women and men can suddenly find themselves left with the real life situation of being a single parent. Single parents and their children have extra work, more vulnerability and less security. Yet many single parents are able to overcome obstacles while improving their education and careers along the way. With care and constant determination...and love, many do a fine job in raising their children to become healthy successful people.
To stereotype single parents is both ignorant and prejudicial. To say a parent has no love or ability to raise a child based on the singular factor of material wealth or lack of, with no further situational details or determinants is not only wrong but a form of objectification...a soulless judgement which does not support life. Life situations change and Love does not have a dollar sign on it but Love is naturally real in the hearts of both a parent and child forever. If that flame goes out, or a natural connection is forcefully broken off between a parent and child, or if all is lost and pressures become so overbearing that a parent breaks down and lashes out in emotional pain in a moment of weakness and despair from being beat down or betrayed with no one to call or no help around...in witnessing such horror and experiencing such cruelty, something gets lost in that child forever. It is the capacity to trust and love.
Those who have lost a parent or both parents at an early age through separation or death know this and may tend to shun emotions and seek refuge in the safer realm of objective mentation. Every psychologist can tell you what this imbalance leads to so hopefully in place of performing autistic sport sex with sex objects where an accidental pregnancy is possible, individuals will stop to think about unwanted long term consequences, wisely taking the proper actions to avoid or prevent conception, rather than risking having to learn the hard way that no one is ever just a little bit pregnant. No one of either sex should like the idea of becoming stuck - not with a treasured and chosen mate/family, but to the doom of permanent obligations and discontent. This life changing choice is up to every individual upon reaching puberty.
Wonder what it would be like to read the comments to an article where nobody made a bunch of nasty judgments. One can hope...
I think when someone gets money (welfare, subsidized housing, free medical care, free breakfast and lunch for the kids at school, etc.), then those who provide the money (the taxpayers) have the right to judge. I do not judge a single mom who works and provides for her kids. I do judge those who willingly sleep unprotected with obvious losers and become pregnant as a result, and expect everyone else to pick up the pieces.
what if it was something totally different you know like it wasn't this but something else and then what would they do they just do it because well you know why they do it and if you don't your an ignoramus who doesn't know their elbow from their bootstrap but that's all well and good and I just think it's something that has to be addresed and even so it might not be the answer but God will know what to do and that's why it has gotten so out of hand because they don't know no better just like all you idiotic ignoramuses out there. you think you know it all and its just stupid what you must go through to get to the point of trying to figure it out.
According to Republicans these folks are just a drain on society. A standard GOP talking point is why can't these folks just live with their families, or stop having babies..you have heard it on AM Radio and Foux news over and over referign to these mothers as most likely a bunch of drug addicts... they should be tested and if they have anything in there system then cut off all funding (already happening in Florida). Let these kids live in the streets that will put america back on its feet. What we need rather than shelters is to give more breaks to billionaires so they will in turn create jobs in China and somewhere down the line these people here will get jobs. Stop giving away everything to these ungratful women who will spread there legs for drugs... "THAT IS A REPUBLICAN FOR YOU"... Think about that in November.
Azllib - How much did you give to support these families? You sound like you are a member of the 45% of tax-filers that pay NO income tax so naturally you think the government has plenty of money. And how you doing with all those food-stamps? Makes it easy to get groceries while your neighbors slave away all day just to try and earn a living.
Ah, so now we have a fine example of the guilt card played by Joyce who like so many assume that anyone with a "liberal" POV (point of view) does not work. Also that the elderly, handicapped and babies should work an eight hour day too as they are a part of that 45% someone pulled out of a hat on the radio.
AZLlib,
These folks ARE a drain on society. And what is your problem with cutting off the funding for drug addicts? Should my income taxes be used to help them get their next fix?
If you truly want your comment to be considered seriously, stop that ridiculous trend of calling Fox News "Foux" news. It shows that you are intollerant of another point of view.
Okay Laura, this is an interesting situation...Cutting off funding can bring more robberies of homes in your area due to the desperate need for drug money or drugs. When people are high or are jonesing they do crazy things. This is dangerous like revolution could be dangerous if polarization between rich and poor becomes to extreme...when there is nothing left to lose, chaos can break out. When in a psychotic state people do unpredictable and horrible things.
However, it is stupid to allow this sick situation to continue or to support it, or to be punished while criminals are rewarded...I understand the anger around this. No it is not fair. Yes, you are paying a fee for staying safe. Perhaps the best thing would be to make sure the funding goes where it should toward real deterrence and rehabilitation. Due to the amount of violence and corruption around drugs, law enforcement is minimal and why shouldn't it be when they do not want to foot the bill or sacrifice another officer, so the attitude is to let the silly dopers kill themselves off... Party til you puke but when puking and dying, eff you because a sacrifice is not worth a low life jail bird. Not very humane is it? Hopefully folks will awaken before it is too late for them to save themselves and just go away and say a big NO because they are the tricks who are paying to play a losing game.
One must literally escape from the physical and social web of addiction. It only takes a couple months to get the crap out of the body so the physical craving dies down. However, the habitual craving is still around in the psychological realm of addictive personality traits which can be worked on in therapy if one is moved very far away from "triggers" and people who make the dope accessible for a long long time. Many times the move is permanent with a total life change.
Perhaps if funding could be directed to such effective counseling and relocation assistance, more successful long term liberation from addiction would take place. Believe it or not, there are many addicted people in frightening predicaments who would love nothing more than to get free. Unfortunately, there is too much black market and big pharma money to be made which is why so many people are not getting the help they need and walking around in some kind of medicated state. Sadly, this really has become a situation where only you can help yourself by getting up and going to where you can get real help. No one else out there really cares about getting involved, used, or putting themselves at risk, but the pushers sure do like taking your money.
As for an ignorant or wrongheaded POV that is harmful...I will intolerantly refute it and prove it wrong any day.
AZLib your spelling is REALLY REALLY BAAAAD. And your grammar is just as bad. Foux should be Fox. referign should be referring. there system should be their system. America should be capitalized. ungratful should be ungrateful. there legs should be their legs.
Now you've just had your first ever spelling lesson. No need to thank me. But I get what you're saying. Peace Pal.
Have you proof read any of your posts? You use almost no punctuation, making it nearly impossible to read.
"what if it was something totally different you know like it wasn't this but something else and then what would they do they just do it because well you know why they do it and if you don't your an ignoramus who doesn't know their elbow from their bootstrap but that's all well and good and I just think it's something that has to be addresed and even so it might not be the answer but God will know what to do and that's why it has gotten so out of hand because they don't know no better just like all you idiotic ignoramuses out there. you think you know it all and its just stupid what you must go through to get to the point of trying to figure it out."
Have you ever taken an English composition class? What about run-on sentences?
''life is what happens while we're busy making plans''-----these unfortunate women each have a story and should not be judged with no knowledge of their situations. i am grateful for the people who provide this help --these children deserve a childhood and some security. i have been close to homelessness but hard work and some good luck got me thru bad financial times. sometimes just a little help can get people back on the right track. i hope all of you religious people remember the ''corporal works of mercy'' -a mandate in the catholic church is ''shelter the homeless-feed the hungry -administer to the sick''. not a religious person but think these are words to live by.
granny - Sounds like you support Obama's spread the wealth idea. I work hard for my money and try and act responsibly. Now you want to seize more of my money to provide assistance to irresponsible people? Where are the fathers? Where are the other family members, can't they help?
granny22 your just full of poop you have no idea what your talking about. your just blowing daisies out the window. you don't have any more of a clue than the man in the moon what your talking about and then to be all high and mighty about it is just about all i can take. do you have any idea how many people are going to believe all that mumbo jumbo good grief it's kind of scary granny22 your name says it all you were a granny when you were 22 years old. good grief get a grip.
Judd... are you having a bad day? Need a hug? I doubt anyone would give you one.
judd-not sure your comments deserve a reply but here goes---i raised two children with out any financial help from anyone (most specifically their father). one is a practicing attorney-one a student. i have been ''in the black hole of despair '' and without the never ending moral support of friends i doubt i could have made it. i was raised catholic but no longer profess any specific religious faith. i do remember many things i was taught and providing for the needy is one of them. i could have been where these women are thru no fault of my own. if canada can live without state of the art military weaponry in order to provide health care and housing (no homeless in canada) surely the richest country in the world could do the same. just why are you so angry with these women--try placing the blame for homelessness where it belongs--in washington!
If you let a loser impregnate you, if you become pregnant and bring a child into the world without a basic foundation for a good relationship between the parents of said child, you are at fault. We women want liberation but refuse to accept responsibility and make excuses.
Only widows are the victims of circumstance. Most are victims of bad choices and dragging their kids into the mix.
Judd...
You are just full of poop too, is not every living being who must breathe, eat and then deficate?
You have provided absolutely nothing of any real content but been having a fun time lording it up being high and mighty giving spelling lessons and making assumptions about how many people will believe some kind of mumbo jumbo...now that may be a fun word like poppycock or balderdash, but I must ask you; mumbo jumbo...about what? What exactly is your point because your paragraph above is completely and utterly devoid one. All you have done is rudely insult and attack poor granny with some nonspecific garbage-like verbage.
On the other hand, granny has made some wonderful comments and a lot of sense. She has years of experience and has worked hard. She states that she has raised two successful children without any financial help alone, as have many women who could not collect any alimony or adequate child support from her husband, who is their father. She has offered solutions and a fine rebuttal to your senseless assumptions above. She has made a true statement about the traditions of the Catholic church.
Could it be her former Catholicism that you cannot take? Are you a bigot? I only asked due to pondering your upsetness based on the information that you so scantily provided. It is not the least bit possible to assume anything. Your upsetness could be because, as Quinn says, you are just having a bad day. There is no way of knowing because there is no information provided. All we have is your mean-spirited ranting about ..."All I can take", and some pointless rude insults so it must be that you are one of those who does a lot of TAKING. Perhaps then, it is the GIVING you are so upset about? Again, nothing specific is present in the words above WHICH QUALIFIES IT AS REALLY BEING A BUNCH OF "MUMBO JUMBO".
I thought this point was quite good and agree with granny:
"sometimes just a little help can get people back on the right track. I hope all of you religious people remember the ''corporal works of mercy'' -a mandate in the Catholic church is, 'shelter the homeless-feed the hungry -administer to the sick.'... not a religious person but think these are words to live by."
Me too granny, just ignore the rude, selfish, piffle-spewed nonsense above. Even with the lack of a comma here and there and a first person "I", your words are clearly true and comprehendable.
Miss Sashay...
Your assumption is a spurious generalization, therefore untrue.
"Only widows are the victims of circumstance."
Some women who are widows, are widows who have murdered their husbands.
As for assumptions being untrue, so is everything else you have generalized about.
Uhh.. where are all the atheist condemning religion? These women are being helped by the Union Rescue Mission. Where is the Atheist or Agnostic Rescue Mission? *sigh* Churches and the religious are never given credit when they do something wonderful. Oh well, I guess that's part of being among the religious. Anyway, I'm really glad that there are people and organizations out there helping. My own church shelters families and feeds those who cannot feed themselves. I pray that each of these women can get on their feet and provide for their children.
As an atheist, I think it's great what the Union Rescue Mission is doing. I am also a Unitarian, and our church does many things in the community to help the less fortunate. When I get my first paycheck, I will make a donation (I have been unemployed for a couple of months, but I start a new job on Monday).
quinn----you sound like the kind of person i would hire----best of luck on your new job!! i'll be thinking of you on monday!
Good luck with the job Quinn...
Thank you, Granny22! I appreciate that :)
Thanks to you too, differnet :)
Have any of you guys thought of sending a contribution to the shelter? Sounds as though they are doing a super job. Consider a small gift from your Income Tax refund!
And if you want to keep it closer to home, make a contribution to a local organization that is helping homeless families. There are lots of them.
1.5 million homeless and growing. No one seems to be looking at the gravity of this situation or that our Congress continues to send billions overseas to countries who are hostile to the US.
The article does not mention making these Dads that abandon their children pay up. If the fathers can't find work then the government should spend our taxes for jobs creation to repair and replace our crumbling infrastructures. Instead they spend billions on countries in the Middle East and allow the Chinese to sell to us while they refuse to buy from us unless they can use us for technology or education.
In the meantime our cheesy politicians smile hold babies and talk about family values all the while working to limit our freedom of speech . Look to the recent attempt to limit the Internets rights of free speech.
Look to the recently passed and signed by ObamaS1867 which further expands the right of the government to now imprison any US citizen without trial indefinitely if they suspect they are a terrorist. Yes if used properly it could put a plug in terrorism in the US. However, it could easily be misused and if history repeats itself it will be misused.
Actually since 2007 our gov. has spent more bailing out the very companies that ruined our economy than it has spent on both wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It is NOT the government's role to create jobs unless you want a Communist government. It is the government's job to track down these sperm donors and make them pay support monies.
Joyce you may wish to look at the Great Depression and how programs by the government helped put men back to work. Our infrastructure is in bad shape. Our police our fire stations and many other support organizations are government run and a form of socialism. Would you rather see our taxes used for unemployment or welfare than used for honest work to help our country rather than paying people to do nothing? If you think letting these people starve is going to be a solution think again because when people get hungry they get desperate and then they get dangerous.
Person-hood does NOT begin at conception! At conception the sperm is maybe a few cells in complexity and that is absolutely NOT a person. Why dont you morons actually try using logic when speaking about when life begins. When you people speak so stupidly yer insulting god because he did bless you with intelligence and for whatever reason you apparently refuse to use it.
Also just in case you dont know it sperm are no more alive than a blood cell or a white blood cell. Until they receive a complete set of genetic code they are nothing more than a mindless cell. And at the moment of conception that sperm starts dividing into multiple cells, but at that exact moment it is nowhere close to being a person because it is at most only 2 cells and there is no way that that can be a human in ANY sense of the word.
Could we track down this sperm donor and demand that he support his family?
Homeless, from Germany, still having babies and now utilizing social services at US taxpayers expense. Great, when is she going home?
I take it that the new babies father is not her husband, again when is she going back to Germany?
As an Army Veteran and taxpayer I'm done paying for all of these wayward women and their children, again, when is she going back to Germany?
Before her children attend another day of free public school, before Doreen gets another round of Food Stamps, WIC, Subsidized housing, Medicaid, phone voucher, car voucher, Day Care, etc., it would cost less to buy her and the children tickets back to Germany!
When do I get to choose how my tax dollars are spent?
When do you get to choose how you tax dollars are spent? When you round up this good-for-nothing slacker father who decided he would walk himself out of responsibility and put him either a) in jail or b) in a work crew pulling weeds along the highway, anything, to make money and totally or somewhat support his kids. Oh, did I break up your revelry, your scenario where only this woman is to be called out for producing children. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but it takes two people to make a kid! So where is your indignation regarding the father? I see it is missing. I am a veteran's wife and a taxpayer, what I would like to see and what needs to happen is for there to be free or low cost birth control that is not hampered by the same organizations (churches) that then have to shelter these families. There are tons of secular shelters that have to also take up the slack from these lazy bum fathers. You want to deport this woman? Through the father in jail with an 18 year sentence (which is when the kid can be on their own). That will fix this situation right up.
Where is the father? You want me as a tax payer to support these families? Enough is enough. I believe in a hand up not a perpetual handout