Satellite shot shows Russia's 'moon shot' ice station

DigitalGlobe

An image from DigitalGlobe's WorldView 1 satellite shows Russia's Vostok Station in Antarctica, the site of a drilling operation that has just reached a subglacial freshwater lake. Lake Vostok may have lain undisturbed for 20 millions of years more than two miles beneath the surface, and thus could harbor living organisms unlike anything scientists have ever seen. The picture was taken on Feb. 8 from an altitude of 308 miles (496 kilometers).

The Russians say that drilling down to a 20 million-year-old lake in Antarctica, more than two miles beneath the surface, is the equivalent of putting an astronaut on the moon. If that's the case, this satellite photo from DigitalGlobe is the equivalent of watching Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin at work.

The photo of Russia's Vostok Station was taken on Wednesday, just a couple of days after Russian researchers reached Lake Vostok in a delicate drilling operation that's been in the works since 1989. Scientists believe the gigantic subglacial reservoir may contain microbes or other organisms unlike any we've seen so far. The achievement also sets the stage for even more ambitious drilling projects that could take place someday on Europa, an ice-covered moon of Jupiter; or on Enceladus, a frozen Saturnian moon that spews forth geysers of water ice. Both those moons are thought to harbor huge subsurface oceans — and perhaps life as well.

The technological challenges involved in the drilling project, as well as the long-term implications raised by studying Lake Vostok, led the head of Russia's Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Valery Lukin, to say that "it's fair to compare this project to flying to the moon."

When the folks at DigitalGlobe's analysis group heard the news from Vostok Station, they checked into whether one of their three satellite eyes in the sky got a good look at the operation. They weren't disappointed. WorldView 1, orbiting more than 300 miles above the planet, got a clear shot showing the drilling tower and other structures at the facility.

"This goes to our ability to see anywhere on Earth on a daily basis," Chuck Herring, a director in DigitalGlobe’s analysis center, told me today.

The sun is illuminating the scene from the bottom of the picture, which means Vostok's structures and vehicles cast shadows that stretch up toward the top of the frame. The biggest shadow is cast by the station's main residence and office building, just above center. The drilling tower casts a long, thin shadow with a flag on top, above and to the left of the main building.

The shadows arrayed below and to the right of center are probably the vehicles used for overland transport to the Antarctic coast, said Peter Doran, an expert on polar lakes at the University of Illinois at Chicago. "They have these amazing, large vehicles with tracks," Doran told me. "They remind me of something out of 'Mad Max.'"

The square-sided area near the very center of the picture is apparently a built-up berm, most likely part of a storage facility for supplies or ice cores.

DigitalGlobe

This wider version of the WorldView 1 picture of Vostok Station shows more of the Antarctic wasteland surrounding the facility. Compared with the close-up, this view is rotated roughly 65 degrees clockwise. The skiway on which supply planes land can be seen running diagonally from top center to lower left, while the ice road to Russia's Mirny Station on the coast runs from the settlement toward lower right.

Paul Morin, director of the Polar Geospatial Center at the University of Minnesota, said one of the most remarkable things about the picture is ... how unremarkable it looks. "Stations like this look very much the same," he said. "Vostok is one of the most remote places on Earth. These guys have done an amazing feat, drilling at this location."

Doran said it was reassuring to see that everything looked normal, considering all the worries that researchers had about the Vostok drilling operation. Some observers feared that once the drill reached the lake, there'd be an explosive upwelling of water from the reservoir. To get international approval for the operation, the Russians had to conduct a detailed engineering analysis demonstrating that they were proceeding safely and surely.

"Even with all the numbers, you just had to wonder whether they had it right," Doran said. Based on the DigitalGlobe imagery,"it's clear that nothing really unusual happened," he said.

Morin said the imagery from DigitalGlobe and other providers has made a huge difference for scientists studying Antarctica's forbidding frontier. "Before commercial imagery, we had better pictures of Mars than we had of Antarctica," he observed. Aerial imagery of Vostok Station will be particularly helpful for scientists on the outside. "We have to stay abreast of what all these stations look like, because occasionally we have to go there," Morin said.

DigitalGlobe's Herring said his company is building up "a tremendous amount of imagery" every day — five times as much as any other commercial satellite image provider. "Right now our raw imagery archive grows by two petabytes of data per year," he said. That's 2 quadrillion bytes of data, which is a big or a small number, depending on your perspective. It's more image data than all the pictures that are stored on Facebook, but just a tenth the amount of data processed by Google on a daily basis.

No matter how you see it, keeping track of 2 quadrillion bytes' worth of images is a challenging task, but Herring said DigitalGlobe is up to the challenge.  "Combining our constellation with the analysis center, we've seen a huge value, a tremendous amount of value for our customers," he said.

WorldView 1 and DigitalGlobe's other satellites will continue to keep watch on Vostok, "to monitor change and understand the facility, and validate what's said in the press about what's going on there," Herring said. For now, the Russians have closed up shop at the drilling site and hunkered down for the Antarctic winter. The researchers will return to their field work in a few months.

In the meantime, the Russians will have to lay out their plans to extract water samples from the lake itself. "If they're going to do that, they've got to write a new document that would be approved by an international body," Doran said. "They're not done. This was just the first pinprick."

Where in the Cosmos? Today's satellite picture of Vostok Station served as this week's "Where in the Cosmos" picture puzzle on the Cosmic Log Facebook page. Every week, we're serving up a mystery picture and asking Facebook fans to tell us what the picture shows. It took only four minutes for Martin Lynge of Nuuk, Greenland, to register the right answer — and as a reward, we're sending Martin a pair of 3-D glasses (courtesy of Microsoft Research) plus a 3-D picture of yours truly that will serve to scare the neighbors in Nuuk. To get in on next week's "Where in the Cosmos" contest, be sure to check out the Facebook page and hit the "like" button.

More fun with space pictures:


Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding Cosmic Log's Google+ page to your circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds.

Discuss this post

Alan Boyle .... thanks for this article .... good job ....

Better that Russia does this , than us .... as long as they keep sharing their findings ....

Stay safe Russian scientists .... and keep up the good work ....

    Reply#1 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:51 PM EST

    Just curious, why do you say “it’s better that Russia does this, then us.” Who’s the “us” and what makes Russian better suited for this kind of operation then “us”?

      #1.1 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:29 AM EST

      Let's see... would it be because they are the only ones who can take us to the Int'l Space Station?

      • 4 votes
      #1.2 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:39 PM EST
      Reply

      Drilling this hole may have been difficult, and it sure is neato, but I don't quite agree that it is on par with landing humans on the Moon. I mean, come on.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#2 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:59 PM EST

      Yes, I think that's a little over the top ... I suppose that's the Russian perspective at work.

      • 5 votes
      #2.1 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:08 PM EST

      Mob and Alan: Of course! Why shouldn't the Russian press (propagandists) put the very best spin they can on what is really an already impressive achievement. I agree that the hyperbole of comparing this to Apollo 11 is a bit of a stretch. As we have all said, it's a thrillng scientific achievement in its on right, it really needs no comparisons to anything else; it can stand on its own. That said, congratulations to the crew for its achievement: drilling that deep into ice at what the records indicate to be the currently coldest place on earth.

      • 1 vote
      #2.2 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:47 PM EST

      An amazing feat no matter what scale you put it on. And yes, I would put it up there near the lunar landing. The technical skills and engineering alone make it a marvel, I'm impressed, they dun good.

        #2.3 - Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:47 PM EST
        Reply

        Do you outsource your articles? It seems that the English grammar mistakes in many articles are those similar to a non-native speaker of English. I know you guys are under pressure to publish 24 hour news but the grammar mistakes are quite silly.

          Reply#3 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:29 PM EST

          Yes, there is a lot of pressure, and I'm the first to admit that I make mistakes. I'm curious which grammatical mistakes you have in mind. I went through this posting, and I did find one case of subject-verb disagreement (complicated by the fact that there was a plural noun in a prepositional phrase, i.e., "line of shadows") as well as a participle phrase without a proper subject. I've fixed those, but I don't see anything that would rank as "quite silly."

          • 6 votes
          #3.1 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:06 PM EST

          Midge: I must admit to not being the most critical reader of Alan's columns, as I am more interested in content than whether his grammar is impeccable, but I haven't noticed any really egregious (spelling?) errors in those columns that I have read. I presume to respond to you because of my background: technical writer/editor with a BA in English, and undergraduate certificate (BSEE equivalent without the higher level math) and experience in writing over 60 manuals by myself, and co-writing another 25. I also had to edit most of my stuff (scary task if ever there was; you see what you want to and miss a lot of errors others might catch.); we didn't have editors with the requisite security clearance. As Alan and you both mentioned, the pressure to get any docuent out on a tight schedule (I had more than a couple of those) wreaks havoc on your ability to catch errors; some sneak athrough. Alan, I now speak for myself: despite what must be a hellaciously high-pressure environmet in which you work, I envy your being at what seems to be the forefront of your chosen field - right at the bloody side of the cutting edge of knowledge. Wow!

          • 1 vote
          #3.2 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:01 PM EST

          Fred, this was brilliant, especially the "quite silly" intended? errors.

          • 1 vote
          #3.3 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:13 AM EST

          I personaly can't spell all that well myself, so I am not going to pick on a bunch of folks that punch thousands of keys a day. They deserve a little leeway in this department. With all the intentional butchering of the english language done in text messages I say give 'em a break. Keep typing folks and I'll keep reading

          • 1 vote
          #3.4 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:05 PM EST

          What are "subject-verb disagreements" , "prepositional phrases" and " participle phrases without a proper subject" ?? heh?

            #3.5 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 5:35 PM EST

            @ Alan Boyle

            There is always someone who thinks they can do it better. Good article, I may not always agree with you but I like most of your work. I'm curious what Midge does for a living, I'm guessing it's not journalism though. Those who can't do critique online!

              #3.6 - Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:56 PM EST
              Reply

              Well looks like some people are going to wind up in serious trouble over at DigitalGlobal since satellite imagery of the Lake Vostok drilling area has been outlawed for years by order of the NSA due to nearby operations involving a magnetic anomaly.

                Reply#4 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:34 PM EST

                Unless it's not the REAL Vostok drilling area! ;-)

                • 4 votes
                #4.1 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:40 PM EST

                Alan: If there be any questionable imagery in the area near the published photos, folks can easily edit it out. It shouldn't be hard. AND, DigitalGlobe could have submited the images to the guys at NSA for approval before releasing them. That doesn't take rocket science.

                  #4.2 - Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:04 PM EST

                  Would it show up on Google Earth I wonder?

                    #4.3 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:38 AM EST

                    Conspiracy Theorist?? Do we need to worry about crossed contrails too? lol

                      #4.4 - Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:05 PM EST
                      Reply

                      I just hope they don't find a Mayan/Egyptian/Cambodian temple down there.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#5 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:46 PM EST

                      Or an alien spaceship with a mimic lifeform!

                        #5.1 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:37 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Hoffa has been found!

                          Reply#6 - Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:05 PM EST

                          I'd like to mix some scotch with that 20 million year old water.

                          • 1 vote
                          Reply#7 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 5:38 PM EST

                          this was clever, i too would like to drink some "unknown" life forms with my scotch. purer than double distilled water.

                            #7.1 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:04 PM EST
                            Reply

                            l

                              Reply#8 - Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:35 PM EST

                              Funny how the comments always sway out of line. For one the gramma seems to really worry some people. As long the message is clear let some spelling mistakes go thru, who cares. I myself, english not being my first language, really dont care. Now if one could have some of that old scotch that was found, together with 20 million year old water. Then i would say life is good. Smile life is short.

                                Reply#9 - Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:51 AM EST

                                I wouldn't be surprised to see Lake Vostok water for sale in the near future.

                                  Reply#10 - Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:00 PM EST

                                  20 million years? My Christian friend says the Earth is only 40,000 years old.... Didn't Fred Flintstone have a pet dinosaur? I'm so confused.....

                                    Reply#11 - Thu Feb 16, 2012 6:43 PM EST

                                    Why would it be necessary to drill on Enceladus? Couldn't we just sample the geyser water?

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#12 - Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:30 AM EST
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.