Fast cars and a Cold War icon: U-2 spy planes keep watch on North Korea

Lee Jin-Man / AP

U.S. Air Force pilot Major Colby drives a chase car as a U-2 spy plane attempts to land during a training flight at the U.S. airbase in Osan, south of Seoul, South Korea, on Feb. 16, 2012.

Lee Jin-Man / AP

The Associated Press reports from Osan air base, South Korea — As a sleek black U-2 roared back from a mission, Pontiac muscle cars zoomed along the runway to help it touch down using a low-tech method dating back more than half a century to when this Cold War-era aircraft was cutting-edge.

These "chase cars" race down the runway at speeds of more than 120 miles per hour to meet each landing and guide the pilot down.


They estimate the plane's distance from the ground in feet and radio that to the pilot — "Five ... five ... four ... three ... three" — until the plane is brought to a stall with about two feet to go and essentially drops down to the ground.

"It's notorious for being hard to land," the pilot said after climbing out of the cockpit.

But the legendary U-2 "Dragon Lady" remains one of Washington's most prized possessions on the Cold War's last hot front. Pumped up by a $1 billion overhaul, a trio of these piloted aircraft are proving they can still compete with the most futuristic drones on a crucial mission: spying on North Korea. Read more.

Lee Jin-Man / AP

A U-2 spy plane takes off as a chase car stands by. When the planes land, the chase car guides the pilot down, radioing in the plane's altitude as it comes to a full stall with about two feet to go and essentially drops down to the ground.

Lee Jin-Man / AP

U-2 pilot Major Colby is assisted to put on a spacesuit and an astronaut-style fishbowl helmet for demonstration purposes. At altitudes of more than 70,000 feet the pilots are vulnerable to altitude sickness. In a worst case scenario, a pilot's blood could actually boil at peak altitude.

Lee Jin-Man / AP

The U-2 was scheduled to be phased out by 2015 in favor of the Global Hawk, which was used extensively in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the U-2 gained a reprieve last month, when the Air Force decided that replacing it with the drone would be too expensive.

 

Discuss this post

Seems odd that technology wouldn't have something to tell the pilot how far they were above the runway when landing. ZEEK

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:03 AM EST

Zeek

It might add to much weight to the plane or take up to much needed room . I still like the SR-71 Black Bird better. If you ever get a chance to see one, do it . The bird is flat out awesome !!!!

bob

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:13 AM EST

That's been going on for decades. When Boeing first flew the 747, they were using an old USAF base in Salina, Kansas to train the pilots in landing without the on-board computer. Most of the pilots couldn't do it without blowing tires.

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:31 AM EST

zeek,

the U2 literally flies on the edge of the atmosphere. every ounce is critical to get that hi and stay.
now granted the pilot should be able to use his iphone and get the same info.
there is a vidoe of James May taking a U2 flight and it is amazing.
http://www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/

enjoy!!

  • 5 votes
#1.3 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:40 AM EST

That was fantastic, OMG really people. Thanks.

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:08 AM EST

I second that. Thank you OMG...

And what May says at the end of the video rings so true, that if every person could see what he had just seen we all would have a very different attitude toward the planet we live on and our activities on that planet. Breathtaking!!

  • 5 votes
#1.5 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:15 AM EST

High aspect ratio wing makes the Dragon Lady very prone to ground effect therefor difficult to land. The U2 was built to be a glider at EXTREME altitudes. Crosswinds and turbulence on landing can really throw off any pilot. Low weight is a must because of rarefied air. One wish, to be in one of them just once in my life.

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:54 AM EST

Kinda makes you wonder why we are spending all this money when we could be getting the same results retro fitting old weapons platforms are using remotes.

Too bad Republicans can't figure out we can afford Universal Healthcare and stop stripping retirement plans from people who've earned them by simply not spending as much as the entire world spends on defense.

Vote Dem in 2012!! Let's try saving money instead of spending it for a few more presidential cycles and see where that gets us.

  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:19 AM EST

Typical Liberal. Can use any story to segway into Republican bashing.

    #1.8 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:54 PM EST

    This article is pretty much garbage. The U-2 has always required a "chase car" to assist it when landing. This is because the U-2 has only centerline landing gear and requires that a crewman meet the aircraft on the runway and attach "pogo sticks" (long posts with small wheels at the end) to the wingtips prior to taxiing. A blue pickup truck will do just fine. There is simple no meed for a "muscle car." This is how the Pentagon wastes the military budget.

    In fact, just the opposite. Really good U-2 pilots love to balance the U-2 on the air currents rising off the tarmac and allow the crew chief to leisurely stroll to the wingtips to attack the pogo sticks. It's a skill akin to balancing a bicycle while standing still. And a perfectly good way to "show off" without breaking any rules.

    The problem with landing a U-2 is twofold: 1) The low wing and high angle of attack severely limits the pilot's visability. And it is necessary to flare out as close to the runway as possible to prevent damage to the main landing gear. Because it only has centerline landing gear, the landing weight is very poorly distributed. But even more is 2) "ground effect." When any aircraft is landing, a hair less than one wingspan above the runway, an aircraft will begin to "float." The more efficient the wing, the longer the aircraft will float. For a U-2, ground effect starts at about 60+ feet above the ground.

    There is no need for a "muscle car" to do this job. An old Air Force pickup truck has always just done fine. Saying that it requires a muscle car to chase an aircraft that is landing at less than 50 knots is simply absurd. I have watched literally hundreds of U-2's take off and land. Their takeoff speed is less than 65 knots and their landing speed considerably less than that.

    While the chase car is calling out the altitude, the pilot has instrumentation that tells him the same thing. What the chase car is alert for is any increase in altitude or cessation of the landing flare. So what they are really "chasing" is to be sure that when there is no longer enough runway left for the aircraft to land safely, that the pilot is notified so he can quickly go around.

    There are only two tricks to flying a U-2 --- not crashing and landing. The U-2 is incredibly difficult to fly at altitude because its Q-corner is so close. There is less than 10 knots difference between a U-2's cruise and stall speeds. And getting the puppy to "settle down" is a nightmare. The instant a U-2 drops below 60 feet, it starts to float. Flaps and spoilers are necessary to try to kill as much airspeed as possible, but all it takes is ine gust of wind and the thing will start flying again. On a hot day it can be close to impossible to get the baby to stay on the ground.

    • 3 votes
    #1.9 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:19 PM EST

    The soldier boys just want to have an excuse to drive a fast car, on the government's tab.

      #1.10 - Sat Mar 3, 2012 8:47 PM EST

      Looks like the coolest job in the military- sign me up!

        #1.11 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:03 AM EDT

        Chris, I'm sure you have first-hand knowledge, but from what I've read, the car has to chase at 120-140 mph.

          #1.12 - Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:48 PM EDT
          Reply

          so the us kept the U-2 and dropped Pontiac... FU GM

          • 4 votes
          Reply#2 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:16 AM EST

          Wow - we are still flying U-2s. What's next? Renovate a few B-29s?

          Some of the surveillance satellites can detect the temperature of a warm piece of metal (about a square foot area from above) to within 2-degrees-F. The planes have more flexibility with time of observation, but the pictures can't be too much better.

            #2.1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:38 AM EST

            These aren't the original U-2s that were used in the 50's. These are much newer & much larger: http://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=129. When I was stationed in England ('84-'87) they converted from El Camino's to Ford Mustangs for the chase cars. Originally the El Camino's had a wing cradle in the back that was used when landing.

            Also keep in mind these things are essentially very large, powered gliders. It's not quite the same as landing other aircraft.

            • 4 votes
            #2.2 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:02 AM EST

            way to delight in the joblessness of thousands of Americans, jerksmith.

            Pontiacs were awesome vehicles. Why they sh*tcanned them instead of Buick I'll never know...

            • 1 vote
            #2.3 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:28 AM EST

            Pontiac's were awesome vehicles. I would never buy a Buick but the Chinese like them. I'm pretty sure I remember reading that Buick is GM leading seller in China. That tell you anything? Evidently they can't handle performance over there.

              #2.4 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:58 PM EST

              "so the us kept the U-2 and dropped Pontiac... FU GM"

              The Treasury Dept's "Automotive Task Force" literally told GM to get rid of Pontiac (and Saturn) as part of the conditions for the bailout. Blame GM management for putting the company in the position to have them taken over by the government. As for keeping Buick, it's one of the leading brands in China. They sell more Buicks in China than they do here.

                #2.5 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:00 PM EST

                I see a Buick Rendezvous and think: "that's one slightly less ugly step-sibling of Pontiac Aztec"

                  #2.6 - Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:15 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  you have to remember back in the the day all you needed were buss fuses and duct tape to go to the moon.besides it gainfully employs someone else to have to guide it down.

                    Reply#3 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:19 AM EST

                    Look-up "Landing the U2" on Youtube. There is an altimeter but landing is hard enough when you can't see the ground well, have to stall it because of ground effect from wings and land on a bicycle type gear (i.e. two in line). The wing gear is added by the ground crew after it slides to a stop for taxiing.

                      Reply#4 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:19 AM EST

                      while you have breaking news that N. Korea agrees to halt its uranium enrichment program and missile test..you put up an article on how the U.S. Spies on them...real smart...SMH!

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#5 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:20 AM EST

                      numbersdude

                      while you have breaking news that N. Korea agrees to halt its uranium enrichment program and missile test..you put up an article on how the U.S. Spies on them...real smart...SMH!

                      LOL

                      I'm assuming you're trolling, but if not and you actually believe MSNBC has disclosed anything regarding US surveillance techniques that North Korea is not already intimately aware of, then "SMH" indeed.

                      • 3 votes
                      #5.1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:44 AM EST
                      Reply

                      You can bet your butt the North Koreans know we're sending flights over them on a daily basis. Remember, the Russians knew it and finally got a missile that would get to 70,000 feet to bring down Francis Gary Powers. Apparently the NK scientists don't yet have a missile that will reach that altitude, or we'd be trying to get back our pilots from them. North Korea has found ways to camouflage entire military bases by hiding them in fake 'cities' of real buildings with no window glass, underground tank and airplane storage, fake 'rivers' in the north that never 'freeze' and lots of foliage that has to be replaced manually as the leaves change colors. They hide because they know they could win a ground war, but not an air war. It's all because they are too totally dedicated to their brainwashing leaders and the lies they have grown up with since 1950.

                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#6 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:37 AM EST

                      I'm betting we're not crossing the border. You can see a whole lot from 70,000 feet even if you stay on your own side of the border. They have oblique cameras that can take pictures to the side while the plane parallels the border; standard cold war technique. Keep in mind that North Korea is a country that shells their neighbor's islands when a fishing boat strays into what they claim as territorial waters; they'd throw a fit if US military planes were overflying them.

                        #6.1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:44 AM EST

                        Mathuin,

                        Thanks for the reminder about the U-2 shoot down. Nobody ever shot down the SR-71 Blackbird - it flies much higher and faster than the U-2. The forced retirement of the Blackbird, allegedly because satellites were better and cheaper, is still one of the most dubious decisions made by the Air Force. One wonders how much money the satellite manufacturers contributed to make sure the Blackbird was grounded.

                        • 2 votes
                        #6.2 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:26 AM EST

                        It's much cheaper to take satellite pictures every day than to fly SR-71 that often. Also, a SR-71 will take much narrower band of images, because it flies on much lower altitude.

                          #6.3 - Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:28 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          cool story. cool plane. uncool second guessers. somebody always knows better than the folks doing the actual work.

                          • 5 votes
                          Reply#7 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:53 AM EST

                          I was stationed at Osan Air Base from Sept 2, 1976 through Aug 5, 1977 and back in those days we would always see a Chevy El Camino chasing the U2 spy plae as it would land. I was a crew chief on the F-4 Phantom side of the base. After all these years whenever I see an El Camino I immediately think of the U2 spy plane. I thought that maybe they were still using them after all these years.

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#8 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:03 AM EST

                          Mailman, the improvement in resolution technology over the past few years that can be easily upgraded in the U-2 vs. whats already in orbit would amaze you, and the U-2 can alter its mission path on a moment's notice, where a satelite typically cannot.

                          As for the SR-71, I had the priviledge to see one take off from its hangar at RAF Mildenhall - it was beyond impressive.

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#9 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:26 AM EST

                          Agreed, Tim. I worked at an Army Intelligence base near Osan, and had the opportunity to see a few U2 land and take off from there. That is the most graceful plane I ever saw take off. Landing was not so graceful though. The thing I remember most is how little runway it needed to take off, then how it went almost 90 degrees straight up, those powerful engines making the most distinctive sound as it did.

                          • 1 vote
                          #9.1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:46 AM EST
                          Reply

                          That's the first time I've ever heard the U-2 described as "sleek". There's not much sleek about it... it's basically an F-104 fuselage that they jammed glider wings on to.

                            Reply#10 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:37 AM EST

                            That Pontiac piece of junk is NOT a muscle car!!!!!

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#11 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:37 AM EST

                            The Pontiac G8 is basically the Holden Commodore. The same vehicle that is now the Chevrolet Caprice PPV police car. It may be a 4 door sedan but being rear wheel drive and having a V8 with 355 horsepower compares it favorably to the horsepower of yesterday's muscle cars. And it probably gets double or almost triple the gas mileage of a 1970 muscle car. Sure they could buy Dodge Challenger SRT 8's with 470 horsepower but that really isn't needed for this role. A 4 door sedan probably has better visibility than a 2 door anyway.

                            • 1 vote
                            #11.1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:56 AM EST

                            They probably picked them up as dealer surplus, since Pontiac is dead.

                            • 2 votes
                            #11.2 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:04 AM EST

                            polfnikufesin!!

                            WOW! The military establishment knows jack $hit, and you know all!

                            Wonder why they didn't contact you first, before making expensive, and dumb buying decisions that we, as tax payers, pay for??

                            • 1 vote
                            #11.3 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:17 PM EST
                            Reply

                            Are we still actively using the U-2?

                              Reply#12 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:54 AM EST

                              We have to, because I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For: How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb.

                              yuk yuk yuk

                                #12.1 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:58 AM EST
                                Reply

                                As far as the "Driver of the Pontiac, what a cool job!!! He get's a constant "Adrenalin Rush" 125 mph !!! That could be addictive!! Hahah

                                  Reply#13 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:44 AM EST

                                  Yes,lets try some high tech gizmo and see if we can make it work. Seriously,they have something that works. Its worked for years and it works well. If they change it,it wont work better,becuase really,there is nothing to improve. The system gets the plane on the ground safely and it has done so countless times. On the other hand,if the new gizmo fails,you lose an expensive plane and probably kill a pilot.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#16 - Thu Mar 1, 2012 2:36 AM EST
                                  refferesDeleted

                                  I'll enlist for the chase car job. 1 fast car on govt. gas + 1 guy = :)

                                    Reply#18 - Fri Mar 2, 2012 11:18 PM EST

                                    The U-2 spy plane was actually my mechanical drawing (HS graduation) project in high school (at MCHS, Stuart, FL.) in 1969. The scale model (mobile) which I built from these scaled down (U.S. Air Force) blue print plans actually had to be able to fly. I didn't know this until the very last moment, and it took three tries to actually make this scale model fly (I had to adjust the nose weight, which was only intended for hanging (mobile) purposes.) Thank God this moment of brilliance helped me to graduate from H.S Goin the top 20%, since the rest of my life potentially hinged upon this. Go God !!! - RC

                                      Reply#19 - Sun Mar 4, 2012 7:19 AM EST

                                      (I suffered a heart attack and stroke following being hit by a car in 8th grade while riding my bicycle on Piedmont RD., which unfortunately went undiagnosed at the time (because of limited family finances). I was delivering newspapers after school in Atlanta, GA in the 8th grade at the time, in order to help my family (7 siblings) make ends meet financially. Thank God I moved back to Jensen Beach, FL by the middle of the 9th grade. I spent the much of my spare time (I both worked AND went to school part time/full time the last three years of H.S., the 10th, 11th, and 12th grade) running on the roads and beach (and MCHS parking lot) in Jensen Beach / Stuart area while desperately trying to overcome the effects of my heart attack and stroke. But I eventually I ended up on the top "Go Team" in U.S. Special Forces !971 - 1972 in the U.S. Army thanks to all of this exercise, after spending summer quarter at Georgia Tech in Atlanta, GA. in 1969.) (I am now 60 years old.) - RC

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #19.1 - Sun Mar 4, 2012 8:34 AM EST

                                      (Please understand that I have consciously known ever since the early 1960s (1961, 4th grade, N. Palm Beach, FL) that the entire human world potentially hinged upon my future survival. I initially found this out by eavesdropping on a loud argument which my grandparents were having at the time that my grandfather was retiring from the Air Force (1956). My grandmother had always wanted to travel the world when my grandfather finally retired, but my grandfather insisted upon them taking us grandchildren back in again, because my father's marriage was already falling apart once again, which it eventually did for 4 or 5 times before my father and step mother were finally divorced for the last time after 4 marriages. (Go figure!) (This all will eventually be important for World History ya'll, TRULY sorry about that.)) - RC

                                        #19.2 - Sun Mar 4, 2012 8:56 AM EST

                                        ((Trust me, you all don't even want to go there, been there & done that (BTDT), know what I mean?)) - RC

                                          #19.3 - Sun Mar 4, 2012 9:05 AM EST
                                          Reply

                                          SR-71 $125,000/hour to operate...more to break out of "mothballs"

                                            Reply#20 - Sun Mar 4, 2012 11:22 AM EST

                                            I was at Osan and Kadena AFB back in the late 1980's as a contractor. I noticed that U2s usually had a Camaro chase vehicle. I was getting my private pilot certificate and would sit at the end of the tarmac and wait for the U2s to land. It was neat to see the U2 approach and even neater to watch the A10s and F16s take off. I was lucky to take a ride in a C-141 Starlifter (Lockheed) and a couple of C-130s. I never got a chance to ride in my favorite F-15E but I did get to sit in the cockpit. Kelly Johnson's SR-71 is the ultimate cold war era recon plane and I have seen many of those at museums around the United States. The SR-71 is simply genius engineering even for today. The engineers used slide rules for calculation back in the late 1950's and early 1960's when designing both U2 and SR-17 planes. Those guys had real brains.

                                              Reply#21 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:26 PM EDT

                                              This comment may be a bit late, as I just read this article.....

                                              I've had the privilege of watching night landings in a place they weren't, they DID use an El Camino and

                                              I WILL say that BOTH were traveling at well over 100 MPH when the Aircraft touched down. It's a Damned good Insurance policy, as an aid to the Pilot who can't see much of anything on Landing....

                                              Since it was Pitch Dark with no Moon, in the place they weren't....There was another Vehicle, which ran ahead of it (About a minute), to make SURE the field was clear...

                                              While it may actually Touch Down at a lower speed, It lines up on the Runway and maybe 20-30 MPH going like a bat out of Hell.

                                              I did a quick search to back up my words, and found this URL, And it has several GREAT actually landings shown from a CAR CAM with AUDIO..... They are worth watching !!

                                                Reply#22 - Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:26 PM EDT

                                                what a tribute to Kelly Johnson lockheeds cheif designer. Sixty yeasr old and the old girl is still paying her way.

                                                  Reply#23 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 2:09 PM EDT
                                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.